Alternatives · 15 models compared · checked 2 Nov 2026
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL alternatives: 15 models in or near grid C5
The closest model to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on the atlas is Claude Haiku 5.5, in the same square, at $0.10 per 1M input tokens against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL’s . 5 of the 15 nearest models are cheaper on input; the cheapest is Qwen3.7 Flash at $0.03. We rank by position on the atlas, not by capability, because we hold no capability data.
$0.15
observed We measured
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nemotron 3.5 Super VL alternatives: 15 models in or near grid C5”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/models/nvidia/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/alternatives
Where the alternatives sit
Each square is a price band (A–H) × a context band (1–6). How the grid works
Same squareGRIDC513 modelsClaude Haiku 5.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 10 more
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLIts 15 nearest modelsOther modelsOpen weights
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Qwen3.7 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| GRIDC5 | $0.10–0.30 | 1M | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, Claude Haiku 5.5, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor, MiniMax M3.1 Flash, Qwen3.8 27B, Qwen3.8 Flash, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, Qwen3.6 Flash, MiniMax-01, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, Qwen-Plus |
Top 15 alternatives
Ranked by steps away on the atlas, then cheaper before pricier, then input price
| # | Model | Grid | Why it fits | Input / 1M | vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Output / 1M | Context | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA · the model you’re replacing | GRIDC5 | Baseline | $0.15 | — | $0.50 | 1.05M | |
| 1 | Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic | GRIDC5 | Same square, 33% cheaper input | $0.10 | −33% | $0.50 | 1M | Compare → |
| 2 | Muse Spark 1.2 ContributorMeta | GRIDC5 | Same square, 33% cheaper input | $0.10 | −33% | $0.20 | 1.05M | Compare → |
| 3 | Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta | GRIDC5 | Same square, 33% cheaper input | $0.10 | −33% | $0.20 | 1.05M | Compare → |
| 4 | MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax | GRIDC5 | Same square, same input price | $0.15 | same | $0.60 | 1.05M | Compare → |
| 5 | Qwen3.8 27BQwen (Alibaba) | GRIDC5 | Same square, same input price | $0.15 | same | $1.88 | 1M | Compare → |
| 6 | Qwen3.8 FlashQwen (Alibaba) | GRIDC5 | Same square, same input price | $0.15 | same | $0.47 | 1M | Compare → |
| 7 | Qwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen (Alibaba) | GRIDC5 | Same square, same input price | $0.15 | same | $0.47 | 1M | Compare → |
| 8 | Qwen3.6 FlashQwen (Alibaba) | GRIDC5 | Same square, 25% pricier input | $0.19 | +25% | $1.13 | 1M | Compare → |
| 9 | MiniMax-01MiniMax | GRIDC5 | Same square, 33% pricier input | $0.20 | +33% | $1.10 | 1M | Compare → |
| 10 | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek | GRIDC5 | Same square, 44% pricier input | $0.22 | +44% | $0.65 | 1.05M | |
| 11 | Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle | GRIDC5 | Same square, 67% pricier input | $0.25 | +67% | $1.50 | 1.05M | |
| 12 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle | GRIDC5 | Same square, 67% pricier input | $0.25 | +67% | $1.50 | 1.05M | |
| 13 | Qwen-PlusQwen (Alibaba) | GRIDC5 | Same square, 73% pricier input | $0.26 | +73% | $0.78 | 1M | |
| 14 | Qwen3.7 FlashQwen (Alibaba) | GRIDB5 | Neighbouring square B5, 80% cheaper input | $0.03 | −80% | $0.13 | 1M | |
| 15 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek | GRIDB5 | Neighbouring square B5, 67% cheaper input | $0.05 | −67% | $0.19 | 1.05M |
What switching saves
3,000 input + 800 output tokens × 1,000 requests a day
Σ Derived from standard-tier prices; excludes caching and batch discounts. Use your own numbers →
Larger-context alternatives
| Model | Input / 1M | Context | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 LunaOpenAI | $0.10 | 1.05M | |
| Llama 4 ScoutMeta | $0.10 | 1.31M | |
| GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI | $0.20 | 1.05M | |
| GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI | $1.00 | 1.05M | |
| Grok 4.20xAI | $1.25 | 2M |
Free alternatives
| Model | Input / 1M | Context | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyria 3 Clip PreviewGoogle | Free | 1.05M | |
| Lyria 3 Pro PreviewGoogle | Free | 1.05M |
Compare Nemotron 3.5 Super VL head to head
Questions
What is the best alternative to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Claude Haiku 5.5 ranks first: same square, 33% cheaper input. Input is $0.10 per 1M tokens against $0.15 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL. Ranking is by position on the atlas, not by quality.
What is the cheapest alternative to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Qwen3.7 Flash at $0.03 per 1M input tokens, 80% less than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, among the 15 closest.
Is there an open-weight alternative to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
None of the 15 closest is marked open-weight in our records.
Which alternative has a larger context window?
None of the 15 closest holds more than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's 1.05M.
How are alternatives ranked?
By distance on the atlas grid from Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's square C5: the same square first, then neighbouring squares. Within the same distance, cheaper models come before pricier ones, then the lowest input price wins. We hold no capability data, so we do not claim a model can do what Nemotron 3.5 Super VL does, only that it costs and holds about the same. No vendor pays for position.
More alternatives
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What is the best alternative to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
- What is the cheapest alternative to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
- Is there an open-weight alternative to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?