Atlas / Skills / mukul975 / Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures

Testing Ransomware Recovery ProceduresSAFE

skills/mukul975/testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.1
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
33,870
01

Overview

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Read from source at commit 6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures
description: Tests and validates ransomware recovery procedures - backup restore operations
  (e.g. with Restic), RTO/RPO target verification, recovery sequencing, and clean-restore
  validation - to confirm organizational resilience against destructive ransomware attacks.
  Use when validating that recovery plans work under realistic conditions, measuring
  RTO/RPO against business requirements, or testing restore integrity after simulated encryption.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: incident-response
tags:
- incident-response
- ransomware
- disaster-recovery
- backup
- rto
- rpo
- resilience
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- RS.MA-01
- RS.MA-02
- RS.AN-03
- RC.RP-01
mitre_attack:
- T1486
- T1490
- T1070
- T1078
- T1489
mitre_f3:
  version: '1.1'
  tactics:
  - positioning
  - monetization
  techniques:
  - id: T1531
    name: Account Access Removal
    tactic: positioning
    source: attack
  - id: F1018
    name: Convert to Cryptocurrency
    tactic: monetization
    source: f3
  - id: F1047
    name: Transfer of funds
    tactic: monetization
    source: f3
  - id: F1017.001
    name: 'Conversion to Physical Monetary Instruments: Cash'
    tactic: monetization
    source: f3
---
# Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures

## When to Use

Use this skill when:
- Validating that ransomware recovery plans actually work under realistic conditions
- Measuring RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) against business requirements
- Testing backup restore operations to confirm data integrity and completeness after simulated encryption
- Conducting tabletop exercises or live recovery drills for ransomware scenarios
- Auditing disaster recovery readiness as part of compliance or cyber insurance requirements

**Do not use** for active incident response during a live ransomware attack. Use dedicated IR playbooks instead.

## Prerequisites

- Isolated recovery test environment (air-gapped or network-segmented lab)
- Access to backup infrastructure (Veeam, Commvault, Rubrik, AWS Backup, Azure Backup)
- Documented RTO/RPO targets per application tier from business impact analysis
- Backup copies available for restore testing (production replicas or test snapshots)
- Recovery runbooks with step-by-step procedures for each critical system

## Workflow

### Step 1: Define Recovery Test Scope

Identify critical systems and their tiered recovery targets:

| Tier | System Type | RTO Target | RPO Target | Example |
|------|------------|------------|------------|---------|
| Tier 1 | Mission-critical | < 1 hour | < 15 min | Active Directory, core database |
| Tier 2 | Business-critical | < 4 hours | < 1 hour | ERP, email, CRM |
| Tier 3 | Business-operational | < 24 hours | < 4 hours | File shares, internal apps |
| Tier 4 | Non-critical | < 72 hours | < 24 hours | Dev/test, analytics |

### Step 2: Prepare Test Environment

```bash
# Verify isolated recovery network is segmented
# No routes to production should exist
ip route show | grep -v "192.168.100.0/24"  # recovery VLAN only

# Verify backup catalog is accessible
restic snapshots --repo s3:s3.amazonaws.com/backup-bucket --password-file /etc/restic/pw
# Or for Veeam:
# Get-VBRBackup | Where-Object {$_.JobType -eq "Backup"} | Select Name, LastPointCreationTime
```

### Step 3: Execute Restore and Measure RTO

For each tiered system, measure the full recovery timeline:

1. **Detection to Decision** - Time from simulated alert to restore decision
2. **Backup Locate** - Time to identify and select the correct clean restore point
3. **Restore Execution** - Time to restore data/VM/application from backup
4. **Validation** - Time to verify data integrity and application functionality
5. **Service Restoration** - Time until the system is fully operational

```
Recovery Timeline Measurement:
  T0: Incident declared (simulated ransomware detection)
  T1: Recovery team assembled and backup identified
  T2: Restore initiated from clean backup
  T3: Restore completed, integrity checks passed
  T4: Application validated and service restored

  Actual RTO = T4 - T0
  Actual RPO = T0 - backup_timestamp
```

### Step 4: Validate Data Integrity Post-Restore

```bash
# Compare file counts between backup manifest and restored data
find /restored/data -type f | wc -l
# Compare against pre-backup manifest

# Verify database consistency after restore
pg_isready -h localhost -p 5432
psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM critical_table;" -d restored_db

# Hash verification of critical files
sha256sum /restored/data/critical_config.xml
# Compare against known-good hash from backup manifest
```

### Step 5: Test Credential Rotation and Security Hardening

After restore, validate that security controls are re-established:

1. Rotate all service account passwords and API keys
2. Verify MFA is enabled on all administrative accounts
3. Confirm EDR/AV agents are running and reporting to management console
4. Validate firewall rules block known C2 indicators
5. Check that restored systems have latest security patches

### Step 6: Document Results and Calculate Gap

```
Recovery Test Report:
  System: [Name]
  Tier: [1-4]
  RTO Target: [target]    Actual RTO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  RPO Target: [target]    Actual RPO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  Data Integrity: [PASS/FAIL]
  Application Validation: [PASS/FAIL]
  Security Controls Restored: [PASS/FAIL]

  Status: [MEETS TARGET / EXCEEDS TARGET / FAILS TARGET]
  Remediation Required: [description if FAILS]
```

## Key Concepts

| Term | Definition |
|------|-----------|
| **RTO** | Recovery Time Objective: maximum acceptable downtime for a system after a disaster |
| **RPO** | Recovery Point Objective: maximum acceptable data loss measured in time |
| **WRT** | Work Recovery Time: time to verify system integrity after restore completes |
| **MTD** | Maximum Tolerable Downtime: absolute limit before unacceptable business impact |
| **Clean 
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-076c59587be632SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures skill do?

817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·

Is Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement