Analyzing Network Traffic Of MalwareSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: analyzing-network-traffic-of-malware
description: 'Analyzes network traffic generated by malware during sandbox execution
or live incident response to identify C2 protocols, data exfiltration channels,
payload downloads, and lateral movement patterns using Wireshark, Zeek, and Suricata.
Activates for requests involving malware network analysis, C2 traffic decoding,
malware PCAP analysis, or network-based malware detection.
'
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: malware-analysis
tags:
- malware
- network-analysis
- PCAP
- Wireshark
- C2-detection
version: 1.0.0
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- DE.AE-02
- RS.AN-03
- ID.RA-01
- DE.CM-01
mitre_attack:
- T1071.001
- T1571
- T1573
- T1095
---
# Analyzing Network Traffic of Malware
## When to Use
- Sandbox execution has captured a PCAP file and the network behavior needs detailed analysis
- Identifying the C2 protocol structure for writing network detection signatures
- Determining what data the malware exfiltrates and to which external infrastructure
- Analyzing DNS tunneling, domain generation algorithms (DGA), or fast-flux behavior
- Creating Suricata/Snort signatures based on observed malware network patterns
**Do not use** for host-based analysis of malware behavior; use Cuckoo sandbox reports or Volatility memory analysis for process-level activity.
## Prerequisites
- Wireshark 4.x installed for interactive PCAP analysis
- tshark (Wireshark CLI) for scripted packet extraction
- Zeek installed for automated metadata generation from PCAPs
- Suricata with ET Open/ET Pro rulesets for signature matching
- NetworkMiner for file extraction and credential detection from PCAPs
- Python 3.8+ with `scapy` and `dpkt` for programmatic packet analysis
## Workflow
### Step 1: Initial PCAP Overview
Get a high-level understanding of the network traffic:
```bash
# Capture statistics
capinfos malware.pcap
# Protocol hierarchy
tshark -r malware.pcap -q -z io,phs
# Endpoint statistics (top talkers)
tshark -r malware.pcap -q -z endpoints,ip
# Conversation statistics
tshark -r malware.pcap -q -z conv,tcp
# DNS query summary
tshark -r malware.pcap -q -z dns,tree
```
### Step 2: Analyze DNS Activity
Examine DNS queries for DGA, tunneling, or C2 domain resolution:
```bash
# Extract all DNS queries
tshark -r malware.pcap -T fields -e frame.time -e dns.qry.name -e dns.a \
-Y "dns.flags.response == 1" | sort
# Detect DGA patterns (high entropy domain names)
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import math
from collections import Counter
def entropy(s):
p = [n/len(s) for n in Counter(s).values()]
return -sum(pi * math.log2(pi) for pi in p if pi > 0)
# Parse DNS queries from tshark output
import subprocess
result = subprocess.run(
["tshark", "-r", "malware.pcap", "-T", "fields", "-e", "dns.qry.name",
"-Y", "dns.flags.response == 0"],
capture_output=True, text=True
)
domains = set(result.stdout.strip().split('\n'))
print("Suspicious DNS queries (high entropy):")
for domain in domains:
if domain:
subdomain = domain.split('.')[0]
ent = entropy(subdomain)
if ent > 3.5 and len(subdomain) > 10:
print(f" {domain} (entropy: {ent:.2f})")
PYEOF
# Detect DNS tunneling (large TXT responses)
tshark -r malware.pcap -T fields -e dns.qry.name -e dns.txt \
-Y "dns.resp.type == 16 and dns.resp.len > 100"
```
### Step 3: Analyze HTTP/HTTPS C2 Communication
Examine web-based command-and-control traffic:
```bash
# Extract HTTP requests
tshark -r malware.pcap -T fields \
-e frame.time -e ip.src -e ip.dst -e http.host \
-e http.request.method -e http.request.uri -e http.user_agent \
-Y "http.request"
# Extract HTTP response bodies (potential payload downloads)
tshark -r malware.pcap -T fields \
-e http.host -e http.request.uri -e http.content_type -e tcp.len \
-Y "http.response and tcp.len > 1000"
# Extract POST data (potential exfiltration)
tshark -r malware.pcap -T fields \
-e http.host -e http.request.uri -e http.file_data \
-Y "http.request.method == POST"
# TLS analysis (SNI, JA3 fingerprints)
tshark -r malware.pcap -T fields \
-e tls.handshake.extensions_server_name \
-e tls.handshake.ja3 \
-Y "tls.handshake.type == 1"
# Extract TLS certificate details
tshark -r malware.pcap -T fields \
-e x509ce.dNSName -e x509af.serialNumber \
-e x509sat.utf8String \
-Y "tls.handshake.type == 11"
# Export HTTP objects (downloaded files)
tshark -r malware.pcap --export-objects http,exported_files/
```
### Step 4: Detect Beaconing Patterns
Identify regular periodic communication indicating C2 beaconing:
```python
# Beacon detection from PCAP
from scapy.all import rdpcap, IP, TCP
from collections import defaultdict
import statistics
packets = rdpcap("malware.pcap")
# Group connections by destination IP:port
connections = defaultdict(list)
for pkt in packets:
if IP in pkt and TCP in pkt:
if pkt[TCP].flags & 0x02: # SYN flag
dst = f"{pkt[IP].dst}:{pkt[TCP].dport}"
connections[dst].append(float(pkt.time))
# Analyze timing intervals for beaconing
print("Beacon Analysis:")
for dst, times in connections.items():
if len(times) >= 5:
intervals = [times[i+1] - times[i] for i in range(len(times)-1)]
avg = statistics.mean(intervals)
stdev = statistics.stdev(intervals) if len(intervals) > 1 else 0
jitter = (stdev / avg * 100) if avg > 0 else 0
if 10 < avg < 3600 and jitter < 30: # Regular interval with < 30% jitter
print(f" [!] {dst}: {len(times)} connections")
print(f" Interval: {avg:.1f}s ± {stdev:.1f}s (jitter: {jitter:.1f}%)")
print(f" Pattern: LIKELY BEACONING")
```
### Step 5: Generate Network Detection Signatures
Create Suricata/Snort rules from observed traffic patterns:
```bash
# Run Suricata against the PCAP for existing signature matches
suricata -r malware.pcap -l suricata_output/ -c /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml
# Review alerts
cat sTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- declared (1 observation(s))
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-network-traffic-of-malware.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Analyzing Network Traffic Of Malware skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Analyzing Network Traffic Of Malware safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Analyzing Network Traffic Of Malware access on my machine?
The audit observed that it reaches the network. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.