Analyzing Memory Forensics With Lime And VolatilityBLOCK
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Overview
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
6c59587be632OBSERVED · 2026-10-07What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: analyzing-memory-forensics-with-lime-and-volatility description: 'Performs Linux memory acquisition using LiME (Linux Memory Extractor) kernel module and analysis with Volatility 3 framework. Extracts process lists, network connections, bash history, loaded kernel modules, and injected code from Linux memory images. Use when performing incident response on compromised Linux systems. ' domain: cybersecurity subdomain: security-operations tags: - memory-forensics - linux-forensics - lime - volatility - incident-response - kernel-modules version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 nist_csf: - DE.CM-01 - RS.MA-01 - GV.OV-01 - DE.AE-02 mitre_attack: - T1055 - T1003.001 - T1620 - T1564.001 --- # Analyzing Memory Forensics with LiME and Volatility ## When to Use - When investigating security incidents that require analyzing memory forensics with lime and volatility - When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain - When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type - When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques ## Prerequisites - Familiarity with security operations concepts and tools - Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution - Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed - Appropriate authorization for any testing activities ## Instructions Acquire Linux memory using LiME kernel module, then analyze with Volatility 3 to extract forensic artifacts from the memory image. ```bash # LiME acquisition insmod lime-$(uname -r).ko "path=/evidence/memory.lime format=lime" # Volatility 3 analysis vol3 -f /evidence/memory.lime linux.pslist vol3 -f /evidence/memory.lime linux.bash vol3 -f /evidence/memory.lime linux.sockstat ``` ```python import volatility3 from volatility3.framework import contexts, automagic from volatility3.plugins.linux import pslist, bash, sockstat # Programmatic Volatility 3 usage context = contexts.Context() automagics = automagic.available(context) ``` Key analysis steps: 1. Acquire memory with LiME (format=lime or format=raw) 2. List processes with linux.pslist, compare with linux.psscan 3. Extract bash command history with linux.bash 4. List network connections with linux.sockstat 5. Check loaded kernel modules with linux.lsmod for rootkits ## Examples ```bash # Full forensic workflow vol3 -f memory.lime linux.pslist | grep -v "\[kthread\]" vol3 -f memory.lime linux.bash vol3 -f memory.lime linux.malfind vol3 -f memory.lime linux.lsmod ```
Trust audit
BLOCKgrade D · trust 69/100 Do not install this without reading the findings. The audit found something that could harm you or your machine.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | FAIL |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (2)
cmd = ["insmod", lime_module, f"path={output_path}", f"format={lime_format}"]system use found in code, not declared in the description
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6c59587be632full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/mukul975__analyzing-memory-forensics-with-lime-and-volatility.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 6c59587be632 | BLOCK | D | 69 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Analyzing Memory Forensics With Lime And Volatility skill do?
817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io standard · Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI & 20+ platforms · 29 security domains ·
Is Analyzing Memory Forensics With Lime And Volatility safe to install?
No — not without reading the findings first. The audit graded it D (69/100) and found 1 critical or high issue in the source. Each one is listed on this page with the file and line it is on.
What can Analyzing Memory Forensics With Lime And Volatility access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6c59587be632), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.