Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama 4 ScoutAnthropic Claude Sonnet LatestWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.3M1M🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.10$2.00🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.30$10.00🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama 4 Scout better than Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest?

Input: $0.10 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.30 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest support?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 1.3M tokens. Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest support tool calling?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes. Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest: yes.

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models

Compare Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest with other models