Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama 4 ScoutAnthropic Claude Haiku LatestWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.3M200K🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.10$1.00🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.30$5.00🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama 4 Scout better than Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest?

Input: $0.10 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.30 vs $5.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest support?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 1.3M tokens. Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest supports up to 200K tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest support tool calling?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes. Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest: yes.

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models

Compare Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest with other models