AionLabs: Aion 3.5 vs Pareto 26.10

Neither wins outright: AionLabs: Aion 3.5 is the pick when you need structured output (JSON schema), Pareto 26.10 when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAionLabs: Aion 3.5Pareto 26.10
ProviderAion LabsUnbiased
Input price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.80
Output price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$3.20
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$3.75$1.40
Cheaper than … of all models we track17%33%
Context window262K tokens (~393 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Larger context than … of all models47%80%
Max output per response33K tokens (~24,600 words)131K tokens (~98,300 words)
Input typestexttext, image
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-232026-10-15
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)AionLabs: Aion 3.5Pareto 26.10Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$345$124Pareto 26.10 saves $221
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$420$128Pareto 26.10 saves $292
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$432$134Pareto 26.10 saves $298
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$276$83.20Pareto 26.10 saves $193
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$156$43.20Pareto 26.10 saves $113

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAionLabs: Aion 3.5Pareto 26.10What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes—return JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes—spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input—✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input——accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search——answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)——repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose AionLabs: Aion 3.5 if…

  • you need structured output (JSON schema) — to return JSON that validates against your schema; Pareto 26.10 does not advertise it
  • you need reasoning / thinking mode — to spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems; Pareto 26.10 does not advertise it

Choose Pareto 26.10 if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 63% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($124 vs $345 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need to fit long inputs in one request — 1.0M tokens is roughly 1,573 pages, against 393
  • you need image input — to read screenshots, charts and scanned pages; AionLabs: Aion 3.5 does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 131K tokens (about 98,300 words) per response

Frequently asked questions

Is AionLabs: Aion 3.5 better than Pareto 26.10?

Neither wins outright: AionLabs: Aion 3.5 is the pick when you need structured output (JSON schema), Pareto 26.10 when cost matters at scale. In short: AionLabs: Aion 3.5 when you need structured output (JSON schema), you need reasoning / thinking mode; Pareto 26.10 when cost matters at scale, you need to fit long inputs in one request, you need image input, you generate long outputs in one go.

Which is cheaper, AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Pareto 26.10?

Pareto 26.10 is cheaper: $1.40 vs $3.75 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 63% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $124 against $345.

How much do AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Pareto 26.10 cost per million tokens?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output tokens; Pareto 26.10 costs $0.80 input and $3.20 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Pareto 26.10?

Pareto 26.10: 1.0M tokens, about 1,573 pages, against 262K (about 393 pages) for AionLabs: Aion 3.5.

Do AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Pareto 26.10 support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — AionLabs: Aion 3.5: yes, Pareto 26.10: yes. JSON-schema structured output — AionLabs: Aion 3.5: yes, Pareto 26.10: not advertised.

Can AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Pareto 26.10 read images?

Only Pareto 26.10 accepts image input; AionLabs: Aion 3.5 is text-only for input.

Is AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Pareto 26.10 free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Pareto 26.10?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 can write up to 33K tokens (about 24,600 words) per response; Pareto 26.10 up to 131K (about 98,300 words).

When were AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Pareto 26.10 released?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 was listed on 2026-09-23; Pareto 26.10 on 2026-10-15.

About the two models

Aion Labs

AionLabs: Aion 3.5

Aion 3.5 is a multi-model roleplaying and storytelling system from AionLabs, built on the GLM family of models. It uses a collaborative generation process in which multiple specialized models each...

Full AionLabs: Aion 3.5 specs →
Unbiased

Pareto 26.10

Pareto is a multimodal composite model built for research, coding, and agentic workflows, while delivering frontier-level performance across a broad range of general-purpose tasks.

Full Pareto 26.10 specs →

Compare AionLabs: Aion 3.5 with other models

Compare Pareto 26.10 with other models

Advertisement