AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 vs Pareto 26.10

Neither wins outright: AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is the pick when you need structured output (JSON schema), Pareto 26.10 when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAI21: Jamba Large 1.7Pareto 26.10
ProviderAI21Unbiased
Input price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.80
Output price (per 1M tokens)$8.00$3.20
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$3.50$1.40
Cheaper than … of all models we track18%33%
Context window256K tokens (~384 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Larger context than … of all models45%80%
Max output per response4K tokens (~3,100 words)131K tokens (~98,300 words)
Input typestexttext, image
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2025-08-082026-10-15
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)AI21: Jamba Large 1.7Pareto 26.10Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$310$124Pareto 26.10 saves $186
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$320$128Pareto 26.10 saves $192
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$336$134Pareto 26.10 saves $202
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$208$83.20Pareto 26.10 saves $125
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$108$43.20Pareto 26.10 saves $64.80

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAI21: Jamba Large 1.7Pareto 26.10What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes—return JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode——spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input—✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input——accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search——answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)——repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 if…

  • you need structured output (JSON schema) — to return JSON that validates against your schema; Pareto 26.10 does not advertise it

Choose Pareto 26.10 if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 60% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($124 vs $310 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need to fit long inputs in one request — 1.0M tokens is roughly 1,573 pages, against 384
  • you need image input — to read screenshots, charts and scanned pages; AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 131K tokens (about 98,300 words) per response
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-10-15, 14 months after the other

Frequently asked questions

Is AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 better than Pareto 26.10?

Neither wins outright: AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is the pick when you need structured output (JSON schema), Pareto 26.10 when cost matters at scale. In short: AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 when you need structured output (JSON schema); Pareto 26.10 when cost matters at scale, you need to fit long inputs in one request, you need image input, you generate long outputs in one go, you want the newer model.

Which is cheaper, AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or Pareto 26.10?

Pareto 26.10 is cheaper: $1.40 vs $3.50 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 60% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $124 against $310.

How much do AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and Pareto 26.10 cost per million tokens?

AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $8.00 per 1M output tokens; Pareto 26.10 costs $0.80 input and $3.20 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or Pareto 26.10?

Pareto 26.10: 1.0M tokens, about 1,573 pages, against 256K (about 384 pages) for AI21: Jamba Large 1.7.

Do AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and Pareto 26.10 support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — AI21: Jamba Large 1.7: yes, Pareto 26.10: yes. JSON-schema structured output — AI21: Jamba Large 1.7: yes, Pareto 26.10: not advertised.

Can AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or Pareto 26.10 read images?

Only Pareto 26.10 accepts image input; AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is text-only for input.

Is AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or Pareto 26.10 free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and Pareto 26.10?

AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 can write up to 4K tokens (about 3,100 words) per response; Pareto 26.10 up to 131K (about 98,300 words).

When were AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and Pareto 26.10 released?

AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 was listed on 2025-08-08; Pareto 26.10 on 2026-10-15.

About the two models

Unbiased

Pareto 26.10

Pareto is a multimodal composite model built for research, coding, and agentic workflows, while delivering frontier-level performance across a broad range of general-purpose tasks.

Full Pareto 26.10 specs →

Compare AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 with other models

Compare Pareto 26.10 with other models

Advertisement