Ml Training RecipesSAFE
🦞+🔬 NanoResearch: The Autonomous AI Research Assistant
Overview
🦞+🔬 NanoResearch: The Autonomous AI Research Assistant
6549c6767ce0OBSERVED · 2026-10-08What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: ml-training-recipes
description: Battle-tested PyTorch training recipes for all domains — LLMs, vision, diffusion, medical imaging, protein/drug discovery, spatial omics, genomics. Covers training loops, optimizer selection (AdamW, Muon), LR scheduling, mixed precision, debugging, and systematic experimentation. Use when training or fine-tuning neural networks, debugging loss spikes or OOM, choosing architectures, or optimizing GPU throughput.
version: 1.0.0
author: dailycafi
license: MIT
tags: [PyTorch, Training, Optimization, LLM, Vision, Diffusion, Biomedical, Muon, AdamW, Debugging]
dependencies: [torch>=2.0.0]
---
# ML Training Recipes
Battle-tested patterns for PyTorch training across domains. Drawn from production codebases
(Karpathy's autoresearch/nanochat, torchvision, HuggingFace) and modern training practice.
## Reference files (read when needed)
- `references/architecture.md` — Transformer/LLM architecture code patterns, weight init
- `references/optimizers.md` — Muon, AdamW hybrid, per-group LR, compiled optimizer steps
- `references/domain-specific.md` — Vision, diffusion, contrastive, distributed, checkpointing, data loading
- `references/scaling-and-selection.md` — Scaling laws, compute budget tables, decision trees, DGX Spark
- `references/biomedical.md` — Drug discovery, protein models, medical imaging, genomics, clinical NLP
- `references/experiment-loop.md` — Autonomous experiment loop (autoresearch keep/discard/revert)
---
## Architecture Selection
Pick the right model by **data type** and **data scale**:
| Data Type | < 10K samples | 10K-100K | > 100K |
|-----------|--------------|----------|--------|
| **Images** | Pretrained CNN + fine-tune | Fine-tune ViT or CNN | ViT from scratch |
| **Text (gen)** | Few-shot prompting | Fine-tune GPT/LLaMA (LoRA) | Pretrain from scratch |
| **Tabular** | XGBoost/LightGBM | Still XGBoost | Neural viable |
| **Audio** | Pretrained Whisper | Fine-tune AST | Train from scratch |
| **Molecules** | Pretrained GNN | Fine-tune molecular LM | Train GNN from scratch |
| **Proteins** | ESM-2 embeddings + head | Fine-tune ESM-2 | Train protein LM |
| **Medical img** | Pretrained CNN | nnU-Net (auto-config) | Swin-UNETR / MedSAM |
**Key principle**: architecture matters less than training recipe at equal compute. A well-tuned
ResNet beats a poorly-tuned ViT (ref: "ResNet Strikes Back", Wightman 2021).
For biomedical domains, see `references/biomedical.md`.
For sequence model selection and compute planning, see `references/scaling-and-selection.md`.
---
## Scaling Laws
### Chinchilla rule (Hoffmann et al., 2022)
Compute-optimal training: **~20 tokens per parameter**.
| Model Size | Compute-Optimal | Inference-Optimal (100×) |
|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| 125M | 2.5B tokens | 12.5B tokens |
| 1B | 20B tokens | 100B tokens |
| 7B | 140B tokens | 700B tokens |
**FLOPs ≈ 6 × N × D** (N=params, D=tokens). Data repetition limit: ~4 epochs before diminishing returns.
---
## Training Loop
```python
import gc, time, torch
torch.manual_seed(42)
torch.set_float32_matmul_precision("high") # TF32 on Ampere+
autocast_ctx = torch.amp.autocast(device_type="cuda", dtype=torch.bfloat16)
grad_accum_steps = total_batch_size // (batch_size * seq_len)
step = 0
while not done:
t0 = time.time()
for micro_step in range(grad_accum_steps):
with autocast_ctx:
loss = model(x, y)
(loss / grad_accum_steps).backward()
x, y = next(train_loader)
update_lr(optimizer, progress)
optimizer.step()
model.zero_grad(set_to_none=True) # frees memory vs zeroing
if loss.item() > 100: # fast-fail on divergence
print("FAIL: loss exploded"); exit(1)
torch.cuda.synchronize()
if step == 0:
gc.collect(); gc.freeze(); gc.disable() # avoid ~500ms GC stalls
step += 1
```
### Key principles
- **Gradient clipping**: `clip_grad_norm_(params, 1.0)` — near-universal for Transformers.
Exception: Muon optimizer normalizes updates via orthogonalization, so clipping is optional.
- **Tensor Core alignment**: batch size, hidden dims should be multiples of 8 (bf16) or 64 (A100).
- **Time-based budgets** make experiments comparable across hardware.
- **`cudnn.benchmark = True`** for fixed-size vision inputs.
---
## Optimizer Configuration
Modern LLM training uses different optimizers per parameter group:
| Parameter Type | Optimizer | LR (base) | Weight Decay |
|---------------|-----------|-----------|--------------|
| 2D weight matrices | Muon | 0.04 | 0.2 |
| Token embeddings | AdamW | 0.6 × scale | 0.0 |
| Unembedding (lm_head) | AdamW | 0.004 × scale | 0.0 |
| Per-layer scalars | AdamW | 0.005 × scale | 0.0 |
**LR scaling by dimension**: `lr * (d_model / 768)^(-0.5)` — keeps dynamics stable across sizes.
### Rules of thumb
- Embeddings need higher LR (sparse updates). Never weight-decay embeddings.
- Weight decay scheduling: linearly decay WD to 0 over training.
- AdamW defaults: β1=0.9, β2=0.95, eps=1e-10 (not default 1e-8 — prevents stale updates in bf16).
For Muon details (polar express orthogonalization, NorMuon), see `references/optimizers.md`.
---
## Learning Rate Scheduling
### Time-based (autoresearch style)
```python
def get_lr_multiplier(progress): # progress = elapsed_time / time_budget
if progress < warmup_ratio:
return progress / warmup_ratio
elif progress < 1.0 - warmdown_ratio:
return 1.0
else:
cooldown = (1.0 - progress) / warmdown_ratio
return cooldown + (1 - cooldown) * final_lr_frac
```
### Cosine decay
```python
def get_lr(step, total_steps, max_lr, min_lr, warmup_steps):
if step < warmup_steps:
return max_lr * step / warmup_steps
progress = (step - warmup_steps) / (total_steps - warmup_steps)
return min_lr + 0.5 * (max_lr - min_lr) * (1 + math.cos(math.pi * progress))
```
**WSD (Warmup-Stable-Decay)**: gaining traction — easier to resume traininTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6549c6767ce0full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/openraiser__ml-training-recipes.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 6549c6767ce0 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Ml Training Recipes skill do?
🦞+🔬 NanoResearch: The Autonomous AI Research Assistant
Is Ml Training Recipes safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ml Training Recipes access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6549c6767ce0), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.