Lm Evaluation HarnessSAFE

🦞+🔬 NanoResearch: The Autonomous AI Research Assistant

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: evaluating-llms-harness
description: Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
version: 1.0.0
author: Orchestra Research
license: MIT
tags: [Evaluation, LM Evaluation Harness, Benchmarking, MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, EleutherAI, Model Quality, Academic Benchmarks, Industry Standard]
dependencies: [lm-eval, transformers, vllm]
---

# lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking

## Quick start

lm-evaluation-harness evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks using standardized prompts and metrics.

**Installation**:
```bash
pip install lm-eval
```

**Evaluate any HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
  --tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag \
  --device cuda:0 \
  --batch_size 8
```

**View available tasks**:
```bash
lm_eval --tasks list
```

## Common workflows

### Workflow 1: Standard benchmark evaluation

Evaluate model on core benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval).

Copy this checklist:

```
Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze results
```

**Step 1: Choose benchmark suite**

**Core reasoning benchmarks**:
- **MMLU** (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) - 57 subjects, multiple choice
- **GSM8K** - Grade school math word problems
- **HellaSwag** - Common sense reasoning
- **TruthfulQA** - Truthfulness and factuality
- **ARC** (AI2 Reasoning Challenge) - Science questions

**Code benchmarks**:
- **HumanEval** - Python code generation (164 problems)
- **MBPP** (Mostly Basic Python Problems) - Python coding

**Standard suite** (recommended for model releases):
```bash
--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge
```

**Step 2: Configure model**

**HuggingFace model**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,dtype=bfloat16 \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --device cuda:0 \
  --batch_size auto  # Auto-detect optimal batch size
```

**Quantized model (4-bit/8-bit)**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,load_in_4bit=True \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --device cuda:0
```

**Custom checkpoint**:
```bash
lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=/path/to/my-model,tokenizer=/path/to/tokenizer \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --device cuda:0
```

**Step 3: Run evaluation**

```bash
# Full MMLU evaluation (57 subjects)
lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --num_fewshot 5 \  # 5-shot evaluation (standard)
  --batch_size 8 \
  --output_path results/ \
  --log_samples  # Save individual predictions

# Multiple benchmarks at once
lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
  --tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge \
  --num_fewshot 5 \
  --batch_size 8 \
  --output_path results/llama2-7b-eval.json
```

**Step 4: Analyze results**

Results saved to `results/llama2-7b-eval.json`:

```json
{
  "results": {
    "mmlu": {
      "acc": 0.459,
      "acc_stderr": 0.004
    },
    "gsm8k": {
      "exact_match": 0.142,
      "exact_match_stderr": 0.006
    },
    "hellaswag": {
      "acc_norm": 0.765,
      "acc_norm_stderr": 0.004
    }
  },
  "config": {
    "model": "hf",
    "model_args": "pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
    "num_fewshot": 5
  }
}
```

### Workflow 2: Track training progress

Evaluate checkpoints during training.

```
Training Progress Tracking:
- [ ] Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation
- [ ] Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks
- [ ] Step 3: Automate evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Plot learning curves
```

**Step 1: Set up periodic evaluation**

Evaluate every N training steps:

```bash
#!/bin/bash
# eval_checkpoint.sh

CHECKPOINT_DIR=$1
STEP=$2

lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=$CHECKPOINT_DIR/checkpoint-$STEP \
  --tasks gsm8k,hellaswag \
  --num_fewshot 0 \  # 0-shot for speed
  --batch_size 16 \
  --output_path results/step-$STEP.json
```

**Step 2: Choose quick benchmarks**

Fast benchmarks for frequent evaluation:
- **HellaSwag**: ~10 minutes on 1 GPU
- **GSM8K**: ~5 minutes
- **PIQA**: ~2 minutes

Avoid for frequent eval (too slow):
- **MMLU**: ~2 hours (57 subjects)
- **HumanEval**: Requires code execution

**Step 3: Automate evaluation**

Integrate with training script:

```python
# In training loop
if step % eval_interval == 0:
    model.save_pretrained(f"checkpoints/step-{step}")

    # Run evaluation
    os.system(f"./eval_checkpoint.sh checkpoints step-{step}")
```

Or use PyTorch Lightning callbacks:

```python
from pytorch_lightning import Callback

class EvalHarnessCallback(Callback):
    def on_validation_epoch_end(self, trainer, pl_module):
        step = trainer.global_step
        checkpoint_path = f"checkpoints/step-{step}"

        # Save checkpoint
        trainer.save_checkpoint(checkpoint_path)

        # Run lm-eval
        os.system(f"lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained={checkpoint_path} ...")
```

**Step 4: Plot learning curves**

```python
import json
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Load all results
steps = []
mmlu_scores = []

for file in sorted(glob.glob("results/step-*.json")):
    with open(file) as f:
        data = json.load(f)
        step = int(file.split("-")[1].split(".")[0])
        steps.append(step)
        mmlu_scores.append(data["results"]["mmlu"]["acc"])

# Plot
plt.plot(steps, mmlu_scores)
plt.xlabel("Training Step")
plt.ylabel("MMLU Accuracy")
plt.title("Training Progress")
plt.savefig("training_curve.png")
```

### Workflow 3: Compare multiple models

Benchmark suite for model comparison.

```
Model Comparison:
- [ ] Step 1: Define model list
- [ ] Step 2: Run evaluations
- [ ] Step 3: Generate comparison table
```

**Step 1: Define

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.