Maintainx Prod ChecklistSAFE
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Overview
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
4f83675ca38aOBSERVED · 2026-10-09Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned | |
| cursor | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: maintainx-prod-checklist description: 'Production deployment checklist for MaintainX integrations. Use when preparing to deploy a MaintainX integration to production, verifying production readiness, or auditing existing deployments. Trigger with phrases like "maintainx production", "deploy maintainx", "maintainx go-live", "maintainx production checklist", "maintainx launch". ' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(npm:*), Bash(node:*) version: 1.11.0 license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore <[email protected]> tags: - saas - maintainx - deployment - audit compatibility: Designed for Claude Code --- # MaintainX Production Checklist ## Overview Comprehensive pre-deployment and post-deployment checklist for MaintainX integrations covering security, reliability, observability, and data integrity. ## Prerequisites - MaintainX integration developed and tested - Production MaintainX account with API access - Deployment infrastructure ready (Cloud Run, K8s, or similar) ## Instructions ### Step 1: Authentication & Security ```bash # Verify production API key works curl -s -o /dev/null -w "HTTP %{http_code}" \ https://api.getmaintainx.com/v1/users?limit=1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $MAINTAINX_API_KEY_PROD" # Verify no secrets in codebase npx gitleaks detect --source . --no-git ``` - [ ] API key stored in secret manager (not env file or code) - [ ] `.env` and `*.key` files in `.gitignore` - [ ] Pre-commit hook blocking secret commits - [ ] API key rotation schedule set (every 90 days) - [ ] Input validation on all user-provided data (Zod or similar) ### Step 2: Error Handling & Resilience - [ ] Retry logic with exponential backoff for 429 and 5xx errors - [ ] `Retry-After` header honored on 429 responses - [ ] Circuit breaker for cascading failure prevention - [ ] Graceful degradation when MaintainX API is down - [ ] Request timeout set (30 seconds recommended) ```typescript // Verify retry logic is configured const client = axios.create({ baseURL: 'https://api.getmaintainx.com/v1', timeout: 30_000, // 30 second timeout headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${apiKey}` }, }); ``` ### Step 3: Data Integrity - [ ] Cursor-based pagination handles all list endpoints - [ ] Idempotency keys on webhook handlers (prevent duplicate processing) - [ ] Data sync state persisted (survives restarts) - [ ] Reconciliation job runs daily to detect drift - [ ] Work order status transitions follow valid paths only ### Step 4: Observability - [ ] Structured JSON logging (not console.log in production) - [ ] API request metrics (count, latency, error rate) - [ ] Health check endpoint (`/health`) returning API connectivity status - [ ] Readiness probe (`/ready`) for container orchestration - [ ] Alerting configured for error rate > 5%, latency > 5s, sync lag > 15min ### Step 5: Performance - [ ] Connection pooling with keep-alive enabled - [ ] Response caching for static resources (users, locations, teams) - [ ] Max page size (100) used for pagination - [ ] Webhook-driven updates instead of polling where possible - [ ] Rate limiting to stay within API quotas ### Step 6: Deployment - [ ] Multi-stage Docker build (small production image) - [ ] Non-root user in container - [ ] Resource limits set (CPU, memory) - [ ] Auto-scaling configured (min 1 instance for webhooks) - [ ] Rollback procedure documented and tested ## Post-Deployment Verification ```bash #!/bin/bash echo "=== Post-Deployment Verification ===" # 1. Health check echo -n "Health check: " curl -s http://YOUR_SERVICE_URL/health | jq -r '.status' # 2. API connectivity echo -n "MaintainX API: " curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ https://api.getmaintainx.com/v1/users?limit=1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $MAINTAINX_API_KEY_PROD" echo "" # 3. Create test work order echo "Creating test work order..." WO=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.getmaintainx.com/v1/workorders \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $MAINTAINX_API_KEY_PROD" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"title":"Post-deploy verification test","priority":"LOW"}') WO_ID=$(echo $WO | jq -r '.id') echo " Created: #$WO_ID" # 4. Verify retrieval echo -n "Retrieve test: " curl -s "https://api.getmaintainx.com/v1/workorders/$WO_ID" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $MAINTAINX_API_KEY_PROD" | jq -r '.status' # 5. Clean up curl -s -X PATCH "https://api.getmaintainx.com/v1/workorders/$WO_ID" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $MAINTAINX_API_KEY_PROD" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"status":"CLOSED"}' > /dev/null echo " Cleaned up test work order #$WO_ID" # 6. Check metrics endpoint echo -n "Metrics endpoint: " curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://YOUR_SERVICE_URL/metrics echo "" echo "=== Verification complete ===" ``` ## Go-Live Readiness Summary | Category | Requirement | Priority | |----------|------------|----------| | Auth | Secret manager, no hardcoded keys | P0 | | Errors | Retry + backoff for 429/5xx | P0 | | Data | Pagination, idempotency, sync state | P0 | | Observability | Logging, metrics, health check | P0 | | Performance | Connection pooling, caching | P1 | | Security | Input validation, audit logging | P1 | | Deployment | Docker, non-root, resource limits | P1 | | Recovery | Rollback procedure, reconciliation | P2 | ## Output - All P0 checklist items verified before go-live - Post-deployment verification script run successfully - Test work order created and cleaned up in production - Health check and metrics endpoints responding - Go-live readiness documented ## Error Handling | Issue | Check | Solution | |-------|-------|----------| | Health check fails post-deploy | `curl /health` | Check API key is mounted, restart pod | | Test work order creation fails | Check HTTP status | Verify API key permissions and plan tier | | Metrics endpoint 404 | Check route config | Ensure metrics server started on correct port | | High error rate after deploy | Check logs | Roll back, investigate, fix, redeploy | ##
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4f83675ca38afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/jeremylongshore__maintainx-prod-checklist.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-09 | 4f83675ca38a | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Maintainx Prod Checklist skill do?
Model-agnostic agent-skills platform with a harness-free canonical layer, verified adapters, and the ccpi package manager. Explore at tonsofskills.com.
Is Maintainx Prod Checklist safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Maintainx Prod Checklist access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Maintainx Prod Checklist work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code and cursor. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4f83675ca38a), read on 2026-10-09. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.