Auto-generated comparison

Z.ai: GLM 4.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest

Z.ai: GLM 4.5 and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityZ.ai: GLM 4.5Anthropic: Claude Opus LatestWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K1M🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.60$5.00🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.5
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.20$25.00🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.5
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Z.ai: GLM 4.5 better than Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest?

Z.ai: GLM 4.5 and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Z.ai: GLM 4.5 and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest?

Input: $0.60 vs $5.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.20 vs $25.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Z.ai: GLM 4.5 and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest support?

Z.ai: GLM 4.5 supports up to 131K tokens. Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Z.ai: GLM 4.5 and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest support tool calling?

Z.ai: GLM 4.5: yes. Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest: yes.

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.5 with other models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest with other models