Auto-generated comparison

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityXiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-ProAnthropic: Claude Opus LatestWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.1M1M🏆 Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.43$5.00🏆 Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.87$25.00🏆 Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest?

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest?

Input: $0.43 vs $5.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.87 vs $25.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest support?

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports up to 1.1M tokens. Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest support tool calling?

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro: yes. Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest: yes.

Compare Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro with other models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest with other models