Auto-generated comparison

OpenAI: o3 vs Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest

OpenAI: o3 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityOpenAI: o3Anthropic: Claude Fable LatestWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K1M🏆 Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$2.00$10.00🏆 OpenAI: o3
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$8.00$50.00🏆 OpenAI: o3
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenAI: o3 better than Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest?

OpenAI: o3 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between OpenAI: o3 and Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest?

Input: $2.00 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $8.00 vs $50.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do OpenAI: o3 and Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest support?

OpenAI: o3 supports up to 200K tokens. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both OpenAI: o3 and Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest support tool calling?

OpenAI: o3: yes. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: yes.

Compare OpenAI: o3 with other models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest with other models