Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Flash
GPT-6 Luna is about 1.5× cheaper on input ($0.10 against $0.15 per 1M tokens), though Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on output. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $90.00 a month for GPT-6 Luna and $110 for Qwen3.8 Flash.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Flash”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/openai/gpt-6-luna/vs/qwen/3-8
Model A
by OpenAI · weights not marked open · GRIDC6
$0.10
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDC5
$0.15
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 1 Sep 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
GPT-6 Luna Qwen3.8 Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3.8 Flash (C5) sits 1 context band smaller than GPT-6 Luna (C6).
Same square as GPT-6 Luna: Llama 4 Scout ($0.10), GPT-5.6 Luna ($0.20). Same square as Qwen3.8 Flash: Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ($0.10). Open C6 · Open C5
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDC5 | $0.10–0.30 | 1M | Qwen3.8 Flash, Claude Haiku 5.5, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen3.6 Flash, MiniMax-01, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp |
| GRIDC6 | $0.10–0.30 | >1M | GPT-6 Luna, Llama 4 Scout, GPT-5.6 Luna |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose GPT-6 Luna if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.10 per 1M input against $0.15
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,050,000 tokens against 1,000,000
- work can wait: it lists a batch tier and the other does not
Choose Qwen3.8 Flash if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.47 per 1M output against $0.50
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is GPT-6 Luna better than Qwen3.8 Flash?
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3.8 Flash?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
GPT-6 Luna
By OpenAI. $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C6. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.8 Flash
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.15 input and $0.47 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare GPT-6 Luna with…
Compare Qwen3.8 Flash with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is GPT-6 Luna better than Qwen3.8 Flash?
- Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3.8 Flash?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?