Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Llama 4 Scout is about 1.5× cheaper on input ($0.10 against $0.15 per 1M tokens) and on output. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.31M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $72.00 a month for Llama 4 Scout and $110 for Qwen3.8 Flash.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity GeGemini XGrok

CoCopilot AIGoogle AI Mode

Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Flash”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/meta/llama-4-scout/vs/qwen/3-8

Model A

Llama 4 Scout

by Meta · weights not marked open · GRIDC6

Input / 1M
$0.10
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
10 Oct 2026

Output / 1M$0.30

Context1.31M

Model B

Qwen3.8 Flash

by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDC5

Input / 1M
$0.15
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
1 Sep 2026

Output / 1M$0.47

Context1M

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

Llama 4 Scout

Qwen3.8 Flash

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10

$0.15

Output / 1M tokens

$0.30

$0.47

Batch input / output

Not listed

Context window

1,310,720

1,000,000

Input types

Not disclosed

Weights

Not marked open

Tiers listed

standard

Prices checked

2026-10-10

2026-09-01

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out

$72.00/mo

$110/mo

RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out

$81.00/mo

$122/mo

Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out

$75.60/mo

$115/mo

Llama 4 Scout Qwen3.8 Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

1 square apart. Qwen3.8 Flash (C5) sits 1 context band smaller than Llama 4 Scout (C6).

Same square as Llama 4 Scout: GPT-6 Luna ($0.10), GPT-5.6 Luna ($0.20). Same square as Qwen3.8 Flash: Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ($0.10). Open C6 · Open C5

Llama 4 ScoutQwen3.8 FlashNearest neighboursOpen weights

View the map as a table (2 squares)

Square	Price band	Context band	Models
GRIDC5	$0.10–0.30	1M	Qwen3.8 Flash, Claude Haiku 5.5, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen3.6 Flash, MiniMax-01, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
GRIDC6	$0.10–0.30	>1M	Llama 4 Scout, GPT-6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Luna

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

Llama 4 Scout

Qwen3.8 Flash

Vision input

Not disclosed

Audio input

Not disclosed

Open weights

Not marked open

Batch tier

Not listed

Free tier

Not listed

Thinking tier

Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

you pay by the token: it costs $0.10 per 1M input against $0.15
output dominates your bill: $0.30 per 1M output against $0.47
your prompts are long: it takes 1,310,720 tokens against 1,000,000

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash if…

Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3.8 Flash over Llama 4 Scout. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen3.8 Flash?

We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Llama 4 Scout is about 1.5× cheaper on input ($0.10 against $0.15 per 1M tokens) and on output. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.31M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $72.00 a month for Llama 4 Scout and $110 for Qwen3.8 Flash. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Llama 4 Scout: $0.10 against $0.15 per 1M input tokens, and $0.30 against $0.47 per 1M output, on standard pricing.

How much does each cost per 1M tokens?

Llama 4 Scout: $0.10 input and $0.30 output. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Standard tier, USD.

Which has the larger context window?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash has 1,000,000 tokens.

Do both offer batch pricing?

Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.

Can both read images or audio?

Input types recorded for Llama 4 Scout: none recorded. For Qwen3.8 Flash: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.

Is either model open-weight?

Llama 4 Scout: not marked open-weight in our records. Qwen3.8 Flash: not marked open-weight in our records.

What would each cost for a support chatbot?

At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $72.00 a month for Llama 4 Scout and $110 for Qwen3.8 Flash. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

Llama 4 Scout

By Meta. $0.10 input and $0.30 output per 1M tokens, 1.31M context, atlas square C6. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Qwen3.8 Flash

By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.15 input and $0.47 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Compare Llama 4 Scout with…

Compare Qwen3.8 Flash with…

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen3.8 Flash?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.8 Flash?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity