Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) vs Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest

Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)Anthropic Claude Sonnet LatestWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
33K1M🏆 Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$4.00$2.00🏆 Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$4.00$10.00🏆 Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) better than Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest?

Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) and Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest?

Input: $4.00 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $4.00 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) and Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest support?

Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) supports up to 33K tokens. Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) and Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest support tool calling?

Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base): not advertised. Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest: yes.

Compare Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) with other models

Compare Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest with other models