Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is about 2.3× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.07 per 1M tokens) and on output. Qwen3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1M against 262K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $50.63 a month for Gemma 4 26B A4B and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it/vs/qwen/3-7
Model A
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDB4
$0.07
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.03
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Gemma 4 26B A4B Qwen3.7 Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3.7 Flash (B5) sits 1 context band larger than Gemma 4 26B A4B (B4).
Same square as Gemma 4 26B A4B: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ($0.06), Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct ($0.07), Nemotron 3 Super ($0.08). Same square as Qwen3.7 Flash: Qwen3.5-Flash ($0.07), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) ($0.07), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ($0.08). Open B4 · Open B5
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Gemma 4 26B A4B, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Nemotron 3 Super, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Qwen3.7 Flash, Qwen3.5-Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
- you want to try it free: it lists a free tier
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.03 per 1M input against $0.07
- output dominates your bill: $0.13 per 1M output against $0.23
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,000,000 tokens against 262,144
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
Is either model free?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Gemma 4 26B A4B
By Google. $0.07 input and $0.23 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square B4. Tiers listed: free, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.7 Flash
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.03 input and $0.13 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with…
Compare Qwen3.7 Flash with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
- Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?