Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is about 2.8× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.08 per 1M tokens) and on output. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $52.04 a month for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.7 Flash”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/deepseek/v4/vs/qwen/3-7
Model A
by DeepSeek · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.08
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.03
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen3.7 Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.7 Flash share B5.
Same square as DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Qwen3.5-Flash ($0.07), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) ($0.07). Open B5
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Nemotron 3 Super, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Gemma 4 31B, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, Qwen3.7 Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), Qwen3.5-Flash |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,048,576 tokens against 1,000,000
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.03 per 1M input against $0.08
- output dominates your bill: $0.13 per 1M output against $0.17
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
By DeepSeek. $0.08 input and $0.17 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.7 Flash
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.03 input and $0.13 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 with…
Compare Qwen3.7 Flash with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?