Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4BNVIDIA: Nemotron 3 SuperWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.09$0.08🏆 NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.30$0.45🏆 Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B better than NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super?

Input: $0.09 vs $0.08 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.30 vs $0.45 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super support?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B supports up to 262K tokens. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B: yes. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B with other models

Compare NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super with other models