Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Q: Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Qwen3.7 Flash is about 2.3× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.07 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 1M-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $49.50 a month for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.

Q: Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash: $0.03 against $0.07 per 1M input tokens, and $0.13 against $0.20 per 1M output, on standard pricing.

Q: How much does each cost per 1M tokens?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free): $0.07 input and $0.20 output. Qwen3.7 Flash: $0.03 input and $0.13 output. Standard tier, USD.

Q: Which has the larger context window?

Neither: both have 1,000,000 tokens.

Q: Do both offer batch pricing?

Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.

Q: Can both read images or audio?

Input types recorded for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free): none recorded. For Qwen3.7 Flash: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.

Q: Is either model open-weight?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free): not marked open-weight in our records. Qwen3.7 Flash: not marked open-weight in our records.

Q: Is either model free?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is listed at no per-token charge; Qwen3.7 Flash is not. Read the provider's limits before relying on a free offer.

Q: What would each cost for a support chatbot?

At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $49.50 a month for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

Qwen3.7 Flash is about 2.3× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.07 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 1M-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $49.50 a month for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity GeGemini XGrok

CoCopilot AIGoogle AI Mode

Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) vs Qwen3.7 Flash”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/nvidia/nemotron-3-5-lightning/vs/qwen/3-7

Model A

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)

by NVIDIA · weights not marked open · GRIDB5

Input / 1M
$0.07
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
10 Oct 2026

Output / 1M$0.20

Context1M

Model B

Qwen3.7 Flash

by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDB5

Input / 1M
$0.03
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
17 Aug 2026

Output / 1M$0.13

Context1M

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)

Qwen3.7 Flash

Input / 1M tokens

$0.07

$0.03

Output / 1M tokens

$0.20

$0.13

Batch input / output

Not listed

Context window

1,000,000

Input types

Not disclosed

Weights

Not marked open

Tiers listed

free, standard

standard

Prices checked

2026-10-10

2026-08-17

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out

$49.50/mo

$25.20/mo

RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out

$56.40/mo

$25.50/mo

Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out

$52.20/mo

$25.56/mo

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) Qwen3.7 Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

Same square. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) and Qwen3.7 Flash share B5.

Same square as Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free): Qwen3.5-Flash ($0.07), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ($0.08). Open B5

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)Qwen3.7 FlashNearest neighboursOpen weights

View the map as a table (2 squares)

Square	Price band	Context band	Models
GRIDB4	<$0.10	256K–1M	Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Nemotron 3 Super, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
GRIDB5	<$0.10	1M	Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), Qwen3.7 Flash, Qwen3.5-Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)

Qwen3.7 Flash

Vision input

Not disclosed

Audio input

Not disclosed

Open weights

Not marked open

Batch tier

Not listed

Free tier

Supported

Not listed

Thinking tier

Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) if…

you want to try it free: it lists a free tier

Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…

you pay by the token: it costs $0.03 per 1M input against $0.07
output dominates your bill: $0.13 per 1M output against $0.20

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Qwen3.7 Flash is about 2.3× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.07 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 1M-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $49.50 a month for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash: $0.03 against $0.07 per 1M input tokens, and $0.13 against $0.20 per 1M output, on standard pricing.

How much does each cost per 1M tokens?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free): $0.07 input and $0.20 output. Qwen3.7 Flash: $0.03 input and $0.13 output. Standard tier, USD.

Which has the larger context window?

Neither: both have 1,000,000 tokens.

Do both offer batch pricing?

Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.

Can both read images or audio?

Input types recorded for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free): none recorded. For Qwen3.7 Flash: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.

Is either model open-weight?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free): not marked open-weight in our records. Qwen3.7 Flash: not marked open-weight in our records.

Is either model free?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is listed at no per-token charge; Qwen3.7 Flash is not. Read the provider's limits before relying on a free offer.

What would each cost for a support chatbot?

At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $49.50 a month for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)

By NVIDIA. $0.07 input and $0.20 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: free, standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Qwen3.7 Flash

By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.03 input and $0.13 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Compare Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) with…

Compare Qwen3.7 Flash with…

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity