Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) is about 1.2× cheaper on input ($0.07 against $0.08 per 1M tokens), though DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on output. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $52.04 a month for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and $49.50 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free).
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/deepseek/v4/vs/nvidia/nemotron-3-5-lightning
Model A
by DeepSeek · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.08
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) share B5.
Same square as DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Qwen3.7 Flash ($0.03), Qwen3.5-Flash ($0.07). Open B5
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Nemotron 3 Super, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), Qwen3.5-Flash, Qwen3.7 Flash |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.17 per 1M output against $0.20
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,048,576 tokens against 1,000,000
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.07 per 1M input against $0.08
- you want to try it free: it lists a free tier
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)?
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
Is either model free?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
By DeepSeek. $0.08 input and $0.17 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)
By NVIDIA. $0.07 input and $0.20 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: free, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 with…
- Qwen3.5-Flash$0.07
- Qwen3.7 Flash$0.03
- Nemotron 3 Super$0.08
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.08
- All alternatives →
Compare Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)?
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?