Auto-generated comparison

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityBaidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K1M🏆 Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.07$10.00🏆 Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.28$50.00🏆 Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking better than Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest?

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking and Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest?

Input: $0.07 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.28 vs $50.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking and Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest support?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking supports up to 131K tokens. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking and Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest support tool calling?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking: not advertised. Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest: yes.

Compare Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking with other models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest with other models