Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 comes out ahead on the data we track: 3 advantages and none for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Key numbers

SpecAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.3
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Input price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$1.25
Output price (per 1M tokens)$15.00$4.25
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$6.00$2.00
Cheaper than … of all models we track8%25%
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Larger context than … of all models69%80%
Max output per response64K tokens (~48,000 words)944K tokens (~707,800 words)
Input typestext, image, filetext, image, video, file
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2025-09-292026-09-02
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.3Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$525$179Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $346
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$510$193Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $317
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$540$201Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $339
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$330$126Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $205
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$165$66.75Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $98.25

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.3What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes✓ Yesaccept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes✓ Yesanswer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)——repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 if…

No advantage on the data we track — pick it for provider preference or output quality on your own prompts.

Choose Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 67% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($179 vs $525 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 944K tokens (about 707,800 words) per response
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-09-02, 11 months after the other

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 comes out ahead on the data we track: 3 advantages and none for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper: $2.00 vs $6.00 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 67% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $179 against $525.

How much do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 cost per million tokens?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens; Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 input and $4.25 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3: 1.0M tokens, about 1,573 pages, against 1M (about 1,500 pages) for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5: yes, Meta: Muse Spark 1.3: yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5: yes, Meta: Muse Spark 1.3: yes.

Can Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 can write up to 64K tokens (about 48,000 words) per response; Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 up to 944K (about 707,800 words).

When were Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 released?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 was listed on 2025-09-29; Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 on 2026-09-02.

About the two models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 with other models

Compare Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 with other models

Advertisement