AionLabs: Aion 3.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 comes out ahead on the data we track: 6 advantages and none for AionLabs: Aion 3.5.

Key numbers

SpecAionLabs: Aion 3.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.3
ProviderAion LabsMeta
Input price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$1.25
Output price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$4.25
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$3.75$2.00
Cheaper than … of all models we track17%25%
Context window262K tokens (~393 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Larger context than … of all models47%80%
Max output per response33K tokens (~24,600 words)944K tokens (~707,800 words)
Input typestexttext, image, video, file
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-232026-09-02
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)AionLabs: Aion 3.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.3Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$345$179Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $166
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$420$193Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $228
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$432$201Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $231
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$276$126Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $151
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$156$66.75Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 saves $89.25

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAionLabs: Aion 3.5Meta: Muse Spark 1.3What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input—✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input—✓ Yesaccept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search—✓ Yesanswer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)——repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose AionLabs: Aion 3.5 if…

No advantage on the data we track — pick it for provider preference or output quality on your own prompts.

Choose Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 47% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($179 vs $345 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need to fit long inputs in one request — 1.0M tokens is roughly 1,573 pages, against 393
  • you need image input — to read screenshots, charts and scanned pages; AionLabs: Aion 3.5 does not advertise it
  • you need file / PDF input — to accept documents without your own parsing step; AionLabs: Aion 3.5 does not advertise it
  • you need built-in web search — to answer from live web results; AionLabs: Aion 3.5 does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 944K tokens (about 707,800 words) per response

Frequently asked questions

Is AionLabs: Aion 3.5 better than Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 comes out ahead on the data we track: 6 advantages and none for AionLabs: Aion 3.5.

Which is cheaper, AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper: $2.00 vs $3.75 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 47% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $179 against $345.

How much do AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 cost per million tokens?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output tokens; Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 input and $4.25 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3: 1.0M tokens, about 1,573 pages, against 262K (about 393 pages) for AionLabs: Aion 3.5.

Do AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — AionLabs: Aion 3.5: yes, Meta: Muse Spark 1.3: yes. JSON-schema structured output — AionLabs: Aion 3.5: yes, Meta: Muse Spark 1.3: yes.

Can AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 read images?

Only Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 accepts image input; AionLabs: Aion 3.5 is text-only for input.

Is AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 can write up to 33K tokens (about 24,600 words) per response; Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 up to 944K (about 707,800 words).

When were AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 released?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 was listed on 2026-09-23; Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 on 2026-09-02.

About the two models

Aion Labs

AionLabs: Aion 3.5

Aion 3.5 is a multi-model roleplaying and storytelling system from AionLabs, built on the GLM family of models. It uses a collaborative generation process in which multiple specialized models each...

Full AionLabs: Aion 3.5 specs →

Compare AionLabs: Aion 3.5 with other models

Compare Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 with other models

Advertisement