Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude 3.7 SonnetMeta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K33K🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00$4.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00$4.00🏆 Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)?

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)?

Input: $3.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $15.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) support?

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports up to 200K tokens. Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) supports up to 33K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet: yes. Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base): not advertised.

Compare Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) with other models