Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude 3.5 HaikuMeta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
200K33K🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.80$4.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$4.00$4.00Tie
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base)?

Input: $0.80 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $4.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) support?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku supports up to 200K tokens. Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) supports up to 33K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku: yes. Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base): not advertised.

Compare Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 3.1 405B (base) with other models