Auto-generated comparison

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 vs Sakana: Namazu

Sakana: Namazu wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAionLabs: Aion 3.5Sakana: NamazuWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00$0.95🏆 Sakana: Namazu
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$6.00$4.00🏆 Sakana: Namazu
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
—Yes🏆 Sakana: Namazu
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is AionLabs: Aion 3.5 better than Sakana: Namazu?

Sakana: Namazu wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Sakana: Namazu?

Input: $3.00 vs $0.95 per 1M tokens. Output: $6.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Sakana: Namazu support?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 supports up to 262K tokens. Sakana: Namazu supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Sakana: Namazu support tool calling?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5: yes. Sakana: Namazu: yes.

Compare AionLabs: Aion 3.5 with other models

Compare Sakana: Namazu with other models