AionLabs: Aion 3.5 vs Google: Gemma 2 27B

Neither wins outright: AionLabs: Aion 3.5 is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, Google: Gemma 2 27B when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAionLabs: Aion 3.5Google: Gemma 2 27B
ProviderAion LabsGoogle
Input price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.65
Output price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$0.65
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$3.75$0.65
Cheaper than … of all models we track17%49%
Context window262K tokens (~393 pages)8K tokens (~12 pages)
Larger context than … of all models47%2%
Max output per response33K tokens (~24,600 words)2K tokens (~1,500 words)
Input typestexttext
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-232024-07-13
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)AionLabs: Aion 3.5Google: Gemma 2 27BDifference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$345$61.75Google: Gemma 2 27B saves $283
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$420$84.50Google: Gemma 2 27B saves $336
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$432Doesn't fit context—
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$276Doesn't fit context—
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$156Doesn't fit context—

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAionLabs: Aion 3.5Google: Gemma 2 27BWhat it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes—call your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes—spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input——read screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input——accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search——answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)—✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose AionLabs: Aion 3.5 if…

  • you need to fit long inputs in one request — 262K tokens is roughly 393 pages, against 12
  • you need tool / function calling — to call your APIs and run agent loops; Google: Gemma 2 27B does not advertise it
  • you need reasoning / thinking mode — to spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems; Google: Gemma 2 27B does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 33K tokens (about 24,600 words) per response
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-09-23, 27 months after the other

Choose Google: Gemma 2 27B if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 83% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($61.75 vs $345 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; AionLabs: Aion 3.5 does not advertise it

Frequently asked questions

Is AionLabs: Aion 3.5 better than Google: Gemma 2 27B?

Neither wins outright: AionLabs: Aion 3.5 is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, Google: Gemma 2 27B when cost matters at scale. In short: AionLabs: Aion 3.5 when you need to fit long inputs in one request, you need tool / function calling, you need reasoning / thinking mode, you generate long outputs in one go, you want the newer model; Google: Gemma 2 27B when cost matters at scale, you need seed (reproducible sampling).

Which is cheaper, AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Google: Gemma 2 27B?

Google: Gemma 2 27B is cheaper: $0.65 vs $3.75 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 83% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $61.75 against $345.

How much do AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Google: Gemma 2 27B cost per million tokens?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output tokens; Google: Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 input and $0.65 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Google: Gemma 2 27B?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5: 262K tokens, about 393 pages, against 8K (about 12 pages) for Google: Gemma 2 27B.

Do AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Google: Gemma 2 27B support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — AionLabs: Aion 3.5: yes, Google: Gemma 2 27B: not advertised. JSON-schema structured output — AionLabs: Aion 3.5: yes, Google: Gemma 2 27B: yes.

Can AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Google: Gemma 2 27B read images?

Neither accepts image input — both are text-in models.

Is AionLabs: Aion 3.5 or Google: Gemma 2 27B free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Google: Gemma 2 27B?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 can write up to 33K tokens (about 24,600 words) per response; Google: Gemma 2 27B up to 2K (about 1,500 words).

When were AionLabs: Aion 3.5 and Google: Gemma 2 27B released?

AionLabs: Aion 3.5 was listed on 2026-09-23; Google: Gemma 2 27B on 2024-07-13.

About the two models

Aion Labs

AionLabs: Aion 3.5

Aion 3.5 is a multi-model roleplaying and storytelling system from AionLabs, built on the GLM family of models. It uses a collaborative generation process in which multiple specialized models each...

Full AionLabs: Aion 3.5 specs →

Compare AionLabs: Aion 3.5 with other models

Compare Google: Gemma 2 27B with other models

Advertisement