AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 vs LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B

Neither wins outright: AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAI21: Jamba Large 1.7LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B
ProviderAI21Liquid
Input price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.35
Output price (per 1M tokens)$8.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$3.50$0.39
Cheaper than … of all models we track18%58%
Context window256K tokens (~384 pages)128K tokens (~192 pages)
Larger context than … of all models44%14%
Max output per response4K tokens (~3,100 words)8K tokens (~6,100 words)
Input typestexttext
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoYes
Listed since2025-08-082026-08-11
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)AI21: Jamba Large 1.7LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6BDifference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$310$36.25LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B saves $274
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$320$47.00LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B saves $273
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$336$48.00LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B saves $288
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$208$31.00LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B saves $177
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$108$18.00LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B saves $90.00

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAI21: Jamba Large 1.7LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6BWhat it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode—✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input——read screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input——accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search——answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)—✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities—✓ Yesread token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 if…

  • you need to fit long inputs in one request — 256K tokens is roughly 384 pages, against 192

Choose LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 89% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($36.25 vs $310 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need reasoning / thinking mode — to spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems; AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 does not advertise it
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 does not advertise it
  • you need log-probabilities — to read token confidence for classification and scoring; AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 8K tokens (about 6,100 words) per response
  • you want to prototype at zero cost — a free variant is listed
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-08-11, 12 months after the other

Frequently asked questions

Is AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 better than LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B?

Neither wins outright: AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is the pick when you need to fit long inputs in one request, LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B when cost matters at scale. In short: AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 when you need to fit long inputs in one request; LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B when cost matters at scale, you need reasoning / thinking mode, you need seed (reproducible sampling), you need log-probabilities, you generate long outputs in one go, you want to prototype at zero cost, you want the newer model.

Which is cheaper, AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B?

LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B is cheaper: $0.39 vs $3.50 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 89% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $36.25 against $310.

How much do AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B cost per million tokens?

AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $8.00 per 1M output tokens; LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0.35 input and $0.50 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B?

AI21: Jamba Large 1.7: 256K tokens, about 384 pages, against 128K (about 192 pages) for LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B.

Do AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — AI21: Jamba Large 1.7: yes, LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B: yes. JSON-schema structured output — AI21: Jamba Large 1.7: yes, LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B: yes.

Can AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B read images?

Neither accepts image input — both are text-in models.

Is AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 or LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B free to use?

LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B has a free variant (liquid/lfm-2.5-2.6b:free). Free variants usually carry tighter rate limits.

What is the maximum output length of AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B?

AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 can write up to 4K tokens (about 3,100 words) per response; LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B up to 8K (about 6,100 words).

When were AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B released?

AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 was listed on 2025-08-08; LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B on 2026-08-11.

About the two models

Compare AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 with other models

Compare LiquidAI: LFM2.5-2.6B with other models

Advertisement