Provider comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Google vs Meta
39 models vs 23 models
Meta is cheaper at the median: $0.18 against $0.50 per 1M input tokens across paid models, about 2.7× less. Its cheapest paid model, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ($0.03), compares with Gemma 3 4B ($0.05) at Google. Google lists 39 models; Meta lists 23 models.
Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Google vs Meta”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare-providers/google/meta
At a glance
Standard tier, paid models · highlighted = better
Google
Meta
Models listed
39
23
Cheapest input / 1M
$0.05
$0.03
Median in / out
$0.50 / $2.50
$0.18 / $0.37
Highest input / 1M
$2.00
$1.25
Largest context
1.05M
1.31M
Batch-tier models
9 of 39
0 of 23
Open-weight models
13
9
Free models
4
0
Vision models listed
3
0
Audio models listed
1
0
Costs for real workloads
Cheapest paid model from each provider that fits the job · monthly
Derived from standard-tier prices, 30 days. “Fits the job” means the context window holds the prompt and reply. Excludes batch and caching.
Cheapest model for each capability
Input / output per 1M
| Capability | Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| 1M context | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.25 / $1.50 | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor $0.10 / $0.20 |
Line-up by price tier
Paid models · input per 1M
| Tier | Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Flagship $3+ | None listed | None listed |
| Mid $0.50–$3 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview $0.50 Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $0.50 Gemma 2 27B $0.65 Gemini 3.6 Flash $0.75 Gemini 3.7 Flash $0.75 +7 more | Muse Spark 1.1 $1.25 Muse Spark 1.2 $1.25 Muse Spark 1.3 $1.25 |
| Budget under $0.50 | Gemma 3 4B $0.05 Gemma 3 12B $0.05 Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.07 Gemma 3 27B $0.08 Gemma 4 31B $0.09 +6 more | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.03 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.05 Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.05 Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor $0.10 Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor $0.10 +6 more |
| Open weights any price | None listed | None listed |
Questions
Is Google or Meta cheaper?
Meta at the median: $0.18 against $0.50 for Google per 1M input tokens. Median is across each provider's paid standard-tier models, so a provider with many small models can look cheaper than its flagship is.
Which provider has more models?
Google lists more: Google 39, Meta 23. Counts are models with a page in our catalogue.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Google: 9 models list a batch tier. Meta: no batch tier listed. Where a model lists both, batch is a median 50% of standard for Google.
Which has the larger context window?
Meta has the larger: Gemini 2.5 Flash (1.05M tokens) at Google, Llama 4 Scout (1.31M) at Meta.
Does either provider offer open-weight models?
Google: 13 open-weight models. Meta: 9 open-weight models.
Does either have free models?
Google: 4 models listed at no per-token charge. Meta: none.
Browse more providers
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Google or Meta cheaper?
- Which provider has more models?
- Do both offer batch pricing?