Provider comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026

DeepSeek vs Google

13 models vs 39 models

DeepSeek is cheaper at the median: $0.27 against $0.50 per 1M input tokens across paid models, about 1.9× less. Its cheapest paid model, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ($0.08), compares with Gemma 3 4B ($0.05) at Google. DeepSeek lists 13 models; Google lists 39 models.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “DeepSeek vs Google”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare-providers/deepseek/google

At a glance

Standard tier, paid models · highlighted = better

DeepSeek
Google
Models listed
13
39
Cheapest input / 1M
$0.08
$0.05
Median in / out
$0.27 / $0.95
$0.50 / $2.50
Highest input / 1M
$0.70
$2.00
Largest context
1.05M
1.05M
Batch-tier models
1 of 13
9 of 39
Open-weight models
3
13
Free models
0
4
Vision models listed
1
3
Audio models listed
0
1

Costs for real workloads

Cheapest paid model from each provider that fits the job · monthly

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out
$52.04 · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
$31.50 · Gemma 3 4B
RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out
$64.43 · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
$39.00 · Gemma 3 4B
Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out
$56.50 · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
$34.20 · Gemma 3 4B

Derived from standard-tier prices, 30 days. “Fits the job” means the context window holds the prompt and reply. Excludes batch and caching.

Cheapest model for each capability

Input / output per 1M

Capability DeepSeek Google
1M contextDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.08 / $0.17Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.25 / $1.50
Paid standard-tier models. A model counts only for what its record lists; one with nothing recorded is not counted.

Line-up by price tier

Paid models · input per 1M

Tier DeepSeek Google
Flagship $3+None listedNone listed
Mid $0.50–$3R1 0528 $0.70
Gemini 3 Flash Preview $0.50
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $0.50
Gemma 2 27B $0.65
Gemini 3.6 Flash $0.75
Gemini 3.7 Flash $0.75
+7 more
Budget under $0.50DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.08
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $0.22
DeepSeek V3.1 $0.25
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.26
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $0.27
+3 more
Gemma 3 4B $0.05
Gemma 3 12B $0.05
Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.07
Gemma 3 27B $0.08
Gemma 4 31B $0.09
+6 more
Open weights any priceNone listedNone listed

Questions

Is DeepSeek or Google cheaper?
DeepSeek at the median: $0.27 against $0.50 for Google per 1M input tokens. Median is across each provider's paid standard-tier models, so a provider with many small models can look cheaper than its flagship is.
Which provider has more models?
Google lists more: DeepSeek 13, Google 39. Counts are models with a page in our catalogue.
Do both offer batch pricing?
DeepSeek: 1 model list a batch tier. Google: 9 models list a batch tier. Where a model lists both, batch is a median 37% of standard for DeepSeek and 50% for Google.
Which has the larger context window?
They are level: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (1.05M tokens) at DeepSeek, Gemini 2.5 Flash (1.05M) at Google.
Does either provider offer open-weight models?
DeepSeek: 3 open-weight models. Google: 13 open-weight models.
Does either have free models?
DeepSeek: none listed at no per-token charge. Google: 4 models.

Browse more providers

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.