`nature-data` 技能SAFE

From the repository's own README, as read at the audited commit. Badges and raw HTML are left out.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: nature-data
description: "Draft or audit manuscript Data/Code Availability statements, dataset access routes, repository plans, and FAIR metadata. Use for 数据可用性声明、数据共享、数据仓库选择 and dataset citations; not general data cleaning or statistical analysis."
metadata:
  author: Yuan1z skill, refactored into static/dynamic layers
---

# Nature Data Availability — Router

## Routing protocol

For a new task, load the core and matching resources below. Reuse already loaded guidance on follow-ups; load more only when the task needs it.

### 1. Load the manifest and the core layer

Read [manifest.yaml](manifest.yaml). Then read every file listed under `always_load`:

- `static/core/stance.md` — what the data-availability package is, the default stance, and the source hierarchy.
- `static/core/workflow.md` — the eight-step workflow and the output format.

### 2. No content axis — confirm journal and language inline

Unlike nature-writing or nature-figure, nature-data has no fragment axis. Its variation is handled at runtime, not by loading different content bodies:

- **journal/article type** — if journal-specific instructions conflict with this skill, follow the journal.
- **access route** — each dataset is classified into one route (public repository, controlled access, within paper, reused public, third-party restricted, justified request, or not applicable).
- **user language** — if the user writes Chinese or requests Chinese guidance, read `static/core/chinese-mode.md` and add the 中文核对 block unless the user requested statement text only.

### 3. Run the workflow

For a wording edit or audit of one existing statement, preserve supplied repository identifiers
and access conditions and check the affected claims. Report gaps relevant to that statement;
do not require a full study-wide dataset inventory or repository redesign. Use the complete
workflow below for a new data-sharing plan, full statement, or submission audit.

Follow the eight-step workflow in `core/workflow.md`: identify the journal, inventory every supporting dataset, classify each into one access route, choose repository and identifier strategy before drafting, draft the statement with explicit dataset-to-location mapping, add formal dataset citations, run the FAIR/metadata audit, and return ready-to-paste text plus unresolved fields.

Do not invent DOIs, accession numbers, repository names, licences, embargo dates, ethics approvals, access committees, or data-use conditions. Flag "available upon request" as weak unless there is a specific legal, ethical, commercial, or third-party restriction.

### 4. Reach for references only when needed

The files under `references/` are deep references, not defaults. Open them on demand per the `references.on_demand` table in the manifest — for example `references/policy-principles.md` for the governing rules and edge cases, `references/repository-and-identifiers.md` for repository/accession/DOI choices, `references/statement-patterns.md` for ready-to-adapt statements, `references/fair-metadata-checklist.md` for the FAIR audit, `references/chinese-author-alignment.md` for Chinese wording, and `references/source-basis.md` to justify a rule with its official source.

When the target is the flagship journal Nature, also open
`references/nature-article-requirements.md` for statement placement,
mandatory-deposition routing, central-code review access, materials and
structure-file checks.

When the target is Nature Machine Intelligence, open
`../nature-shared/journal-formats/nature-machine-intelligence.md`. Enforce a
Data Availability statement and a separate `Code availability` section after
it and before references; check reviewer access, precise restrictions,
repository/identifier quality and the Software Submission Checklist for newly
developed central code.

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

[![ModelsAtlas audit: `nature-data` 技能](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/yuan1z0825/nature-data/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/yuan1z0825/nature-data/)

Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.