Golang Error HandlingSAFE
๐ง๐จ A collection of Golang agentic skills that works
Overview
๐ง๐จ A collection of Golang agentic skills that works
3823d8ae0038OBSERVED ยท 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| claude-code | mentioned | |
| codex | mentioned | |
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit โ this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: golang-error-handling
description: "Idiomatic Golang error handling โ creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics โ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops` skill; for slog handler ecosystem โ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-slog` skill."
user-invocable: true
license: MIT
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code, Codex or similar harness, and for projects using Golang.
metadata:
author: samber
version: "1.3.1"
openclaw:
emoji: "โ "
homepage: https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang
requires:
bins:
- go
install: []
allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:*) Bash(golangci-lint:*) Bash(git:*) Agent
paths:
- "**/*.go"
---
**Persona:** You are a Go reliability engineer. You treat every error as an event that must either be handled or propagated with context โ silent failures and duplicate logs are equally unacceptable.
**Orchestration mode:** Fan out the five category sub-agents described in the "Parallelizing Error Handling Audits" section (creation, wrapping, single-handling rule, panic/recover, structured logging) for auditing error handling across a large codebase, and consolidate their findings. On Claude Code, use `ultracode` to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.
**Modes:**
- **Coding mode** โ writing new error handling code. Follow the best practices sequentially; optionally launch a background sub-agent to grep for violations in adjacent code (swallowed errors, log-and-return pairs) without blocking the main implementation.
- **Review mode** โ reviewing a PR's error handling changes. Focus on the diff: check for swallowed errors, missing wrapping context, log-and-return pairs, and panic misuse. Sequential.
- **Audit mode** โ auditing existing error handling across a codebase. Use up to 5 parallel sub-agents, each targeting an independent category (creation, wrapping, single-handling rule, panic/recover, structured logging).
> **Community default.** A company skill that explicitly supersedes `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling` skill takes precedence.
# Go Error Handling Best Practices
This skill guides the creation of robust, idiomatic error handling in Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, debuggable, and production-ready error code.
## Best Practices Summary
1. **Returned errors MUST always be checked** โ NEVER discard with `_`
2. **Errors MUST be wrapped with context** using `fmt.Errorf("{context}: %w", err)`
3. **Error strings MUST be lowercase**, without trailing punctuation
4. **Use `%w` internally, `%v` at system boundaries** to control error chain exposure
5. **MUST use `errors.Is` for sentinel matching and `errors.As`/`errors.AsType` for typed chain inspection** instead of direct comparison or bare type assertions. For Go 1.26+, prefer `errors.AsType[T](err)` when `T` implements `error`; use `errors.As(err, &target)` for Go <1.26 or for non-error interface targets.
6. **SHOULD use `errors.Join`** (Go 1.20+) to combine independent errors
7. **Errors MUST be either logged OR returned**, NEVER both (single handling rule)
8. **Use sentinel errors** for expected conditions, custom types for carrying data
9. **NEVER use `panic` for expected error conditions** โ reserve for truly unrecoverable states
10. **SHOULD use `slog`** (Go 1.21+) for structured error logging โ not `fmt.Println` or `log.Printf`
11. **Use `samber/oops`** for production errors needing stack traces, user/tenant context, or structured attributes
12. **Log HTTP requests** with structured middleware capturing method, path, status, and duration
13. **Use log levels** to indicate error severity
14. **Never expose technical errors to users** โ translate internal errors to user-friendly messages, log technical details separately
15. **Keep log grouping low-cardinality** โ at logging/APM boundaries, keep message templates stable and attach IDs, paths, line numbers, and counts as structured attributes. Error values may include useful operational context, but avoid putting high-cardinality data into the stable log message used for grouping.
## Detailed Reference
- **[Error Creation](./references/error-creation.md)** โ How to create errors that tell the story: error messages should be lowercase, no punctuation, and describe what happened without prescribing action. Covers sentinel errors (one-time preallocation for performance), custom error types (for carrying rich context), and the decision table for which to use when.
- **[Error Wrapping and Inspection](./references/error-wrapping.md)** โ Why `fmt.Errorf("{context}: %w", err)` beats `fmt.Errorf("{context}: %v", err)` (chains vs concatenation). How to inspect chains with `errors.Is`, `errors.As`, and Go 1.26+ `errors.AsType` for type-safe error handling, and `errors.Join` for combining independent errors.
- **[Error Handling Patterns and Logging](./references/error-handling.md)** โ The single handling rule: errors are either logged OR returned, NEVER both (prevents duplicate logs cluttering aggregators). Panic/recover design, `samber/oops` for production errors, and `slog` structured logging integration for APM tools.
## Parallelizing Error Handling Audits
When auditing error handling across a large codebase, use up to 5 parallel sub-agents โ each targets an independent error category:
- Sub-agent 1: Error creation โ validate `errors.New`/`fmt.Errorf` usage, low-cardinality messages, custom types
- Sub-agent 2: Error wrapping โ audit `%w` vs `%v`, verify `errors.Is`/`errors.As` patterns
- Sub-agent 3: Single handling rule โ find log-and-return violations, swallowed errors, discTrust audit
SAFEgrade B ยท trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
3823d8ae0038full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/samber__golang-error-handling.json ยท Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | 3823d8ae0038 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Golang Error Handling skill do?
๐ง๐จ A collection of Golang agentic skills that works
Is Golang Error Handling safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Golang Error Handling access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Golang Error Handling work with?
Its documentation mentions claude-code, codex and openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (3823d8ae0038), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes โ this is the first audit.