Atlas / Skills / paperclipai / Wiki Lint

Wiki LintCAUTION

skills/paperclipai/wiki-lint

The open-source app everyone uses to manage agents at work

Verdict
CAUTION
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
81,307
01

Overview

The open-source app everyone uses to manage agents at work

Read from source at commit 59d017e6174aOBSERVED · 2026-09-23
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: wiki-lint
description: Use when an LLM Wiki operation issue is a lint or health check. Audit for contradictions, orphans, weak provenance, broken links, missing concept pages, and index/log drift; return triage findings without auto-fixing.
---

# Wiki Lint

Audit, do not edit. Return findings the maintainer (human or agent) can triage.

## Inputs

- An operation issue with `operationType: "lint"`.
- The operation issue's target `wikiId`, `spaceSlug`, and space root. Lint only that space unless the issue explicitly says this is a multi-space sweep.

## Workflow

1. **Walk the target space's `wiki/index.md` and wiki tree** with `wiki_search` and `wiki_read_page`, always passing the operation issue's `wikiId` and `spaceSlug`. Build a mental map of: pages that exist, pages referenced from `index.md`, pages referenced from other pages, and raw sources.
2. **Check for the seven recurring issues**, in this order:
   1. **Contradictions** — two pages making incompatible claims about the same entity, decision, or status. Flag both pages, name the conflicting claims, and quote evidence.
   2. **Stale claims** — a page asserts X, but a newer source under `raw/` has superseded it. Flag the older page; never overwrite.
   3. **Orphan pages** — a `wiki/` page is not linked from `index.md` and not referenced from any other wiki page. Either it should be linked, removed, or merged.
   4. **Concept gaps** — a term appears on three or more pages but has no dedicated `wiki/concepts/<slug>.md`. Recommend creating one.
   5. **Broken `[[wiki-links]]`** — a link target file does not exist.
   6. **Weak provenance** — a non-trivial claim is uncited or cites only the wiki itself in a circle. The original source ref should be findable.
   7. **Index / log drift** — pages exist that are not in `index.md`, or `index.md` lists pages that no longer exist. Recent operations in `wiki/log.md` that did not produce a corresponding page change.
3. **Return a triage list**, grouped by severity:
   - **critical**: contradictions, broken links to active pages, fabricated citations.
   - **medium**: stale claims, weak provenance, large concept gaps.
   - **low**: orphans, log drift, small index gaps.
   Each item has: file path, evidence (a 1–2 line quote), suggested fix, and the operation that should follow up (`ingest`, `paperclip-distill`, `index-refresh`, manual review).
4. **Do not write to `wiki/`.** Lint is read-only by design — the maintainer or the routine that follows decides which findings to act on.
5. **Append a log entry** describing the run:
   ```
   ## [YYYY-MM-DD] lint | <N findings, M critical>
   - operation issue: <issue identifier>
   - critical: <count>
   - medium: <count>
   - low: <count>
   ```

## Voice

- Lead with the count by severity.
- Each finding is one bullet. Resist commentary.
- When in doubt about severity, say so and surface it as medium with a "verify" note.

## Verification

Before closing the operation issue:

- [ ] Findings are grouped by severity with file paths, evidence, and suggested fix per item.
- [ ] No files under `raw/` were modified. No files under `wiki/` were modified except `wiki/log.md`.
- [ ] If the run found nothing, the issue is closed with "no findings" and the log entry still exists so future audits can see this run happened.

## Tools

`wiki_search`, `wiki_read_page`, `wiki_list_sources`, `wiki_read_source`, `wiki_write_page` (only `wiki/log.md`). Always include the operation issue's `wikiId` and `spaceSlug`.
03

Trust audit

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryWARN
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (2)

MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/skills/company-creator
.claude/skills/company-creator
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/skills/paperclip
.claude/skills/paperclip
Why it matters. link not followed

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-09-23 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 59d017e6174afull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/paperclipai__wiki-lint.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-09-2359d017e6174aCAUTIONB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Wiki Lint skill do?

The open-source app everyone uses to manage agents at work

Is Wiki Lint safe to install?

With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 2 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.

What can Wiki Lint access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (59d017e6174a), read on 2026-09-23. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement