Nw Fp Hexagonal ArchitectureSAFE
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Overview
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
1a864ec81cdeOBSERVED · 2026-10-14What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: nw-fp-hexagonal-architecture
agent: nw-functional-software-crafter
description: Hexagonal architecture patterns with pure core and side-effect shell for functional codebases
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# FP Hexagonal Architecture
Ports and adapters in functional programming. Structure applications with a pure core and side-effect shell.
Cross-references: [fp-principles](../nw-fp-principles/SKILL.md) | [fp-domain-modeling](../nw-fp-domain-modeling/SKILL.md) | [fp-usable-design](../nw-fp-usable-design/SKILL.md)
---
## 1. The Natural Fit
[STARTER]
Functional architecture naturally implements ports and adapters. The paradigm's separation of pure functions from side effects IS the hexagonal boundary.
| OOP Concept | FP Equivalent | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Port (interface) | Function type signature / type alias | Port defines contract; function signature IS that contract |
| Adapter (class) | Concrete function implementation | Adapter fulfills contract; matching function does same |
| DI container | Function parameters / partial application | Dependencies passed as arguments, no container needed |
| Domain service class | Module of pure functions | Related pure functions replace stateful service object |
| Entity with behavior | Immutable data + functions operating on it | Data and behavior separated; functions transform immutable values |
---
## 2. Pure Core / Side-Effect Shell
[STARTER]
All business logic is pure; all side effects live at the system's edges.
**The Sandwich Pattern**: Read (impure) -> Decide (pure) -> Write (impure)
```
+--------------------------------------------------+
| Side-Effect Shell (thin) |
| - HTTP handlers, CLI, message consumers |
| - Database access, file I/O, network calls |
| - Reads data, calls core, writes results |
| |
| +--------------------------------------------+ |
| | Pure Core (large) | |
| | - Pure functions only | |
| | - Domain logic, validation, calculation | |
| | - No I/O, no side effects | |
| | - Immutable data transformations | |
| +--------------------------------------------+ |
+--------------------------------------------------+
```
**Dependency Rule**: Shell may call core. Core never calls shell. Core is unaware of shell's existence.
**Why**: Pure core is trivially testable (no mocks, no setup, no teardown). Shell is thin and needs few integration tests.
---
## 3. Ports as Function Types
[STARTER]
A port is a function type signature describing a capability the domain needs:
```
FindOrder : OrderId -> AsyncResult<Order option>
SaveOrder : Order -> AsyncResult<unit>
SendEmail : Email -> AsyncResult<unit>
GetPrice : ProductCode -> Price
CheckExists : ProductCode -> bool
```
**When to define**: Domain needs a capability involving I/O or external systems. Domain declares WHAT; adapter provides HOW.
**Naming**: Verb-noun. Name describes capability, not technology.
---
## 4. Adapters as Implementations
[STARTER]
An adapter is a concrete function matching a port's type signature:
```
PostgresOrderRepo.findOrder : OrderId -> AsyncResult<Order option>
InMemoryOrderRepo.findOrder : OrderId -> AsyncResult<Order option>
```
Both match the `FindOrder` port. Domain doesn't know which is used.
---
## 5. Dependency Injection via Functions
[STARTER] -> [INTERMEDIATE] -> [ADVANCED]
### Decision Tree: How to Inject This Dependency?
```
How many dependencies does the function need?
1-3 --> [STARTER] Functions as Parameters
4-6 --> [INTERMEDIATE] Consider Environment Pattern or grouping
7+ --> [ADVANCED] Capability Interfaces or Effect System
(also: reconsider function responsibilities)
```
### [STARTER] Functions as Parameters
Pass dependencies as function parameters. Partially apply at composition root.
```
placeOrder (findCustomer) (saveOrder) (rawOrder) = ...
placeOrderHandler = placeOrder Database.findCustomer Database.saveOrder
```
### [INTERMEDIATE] Environment Pattern (Reader)
Dependencies in a record, provided once at top level. Use when parameter threading becomes painful (4+ deps).
```
placeOrder (rawOrder) = reader { env = ask(); env.findCustomer(rawOrder.customerId) ... }
placeOrder(rawOrder) |> runWith(productionEnv)
```
### [ADVANCED] Capability Interfaces / Effect Systems
Abstract over effect types (tagless final) or use fine-grained effect tracking (ZIO, Koka). Use for large codebases with many effects.
### Recommendation by Context
| Context | Approach |
|---|---|
| Small/medium codebase | Functions as parameters |
| Large codebase, many effects | Capability interfaces or effect system |
| Pragmatic TypeScript/F# | Functions as parameters + modules |
---
## 6. Pipeline Composition Through Architecture
[INTERMEDIATE]
Workflows flow through architecture as pipelines:
```
HTTP Request
-> Parse (shell: impure)
-> Validate (core: pure)
-> Calculate (core: pure)
-> Persist (shell: impure)
-> Respond (shell: impure)
```
Each pure step is a function in the pipeline. Shell handles I/O at start and end.
**Error-track pipelines**: Each step returns Result type; pipeline short-circuits on first failure. See [fp-domain-modeling](../nw-fp-domain-modeling/SKILL.md).
**Collect-all-errors**: When you need ALL validation errors, use Applicative style. See [fp-principles](../nw-fp-principles/SKILL.md) section 5.
---
## 7. Testing Strategy
[INTERMEDIATE]
| Layer | Test Type | Volume | Speed | Mocks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure core (domain) | Unit + Property-based | Many | Fast (ms) | None |
| Composition root | Integration (wiring) | Few | Medium | None |
| Adapters | Integration | Few per adapter | Slow | None (real deps) |
| End-to-end | System tests | Very few | Slowest | None |
**Key insight**: Pure functions need no mocking. Input in, outpuTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
1a864ec81cdefull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/nwave-ai__nw-fp-hexagonal-architecture.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 1a864ec81cde | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Nw Fp Hexagonal Architecture skill do?
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Is Nw Fp Hexagonal Architecture safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Nw Fp Hexagonal Architecture access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (1a864ec81cde), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.