Nw Ddd TacticalSAFE
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Overview
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
1a864ec81cdeOBSERVED · 2026-10-14What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: nw-ddd-tactical description: Tactical DDD — aggregate design rules, entities, value objects, domain events, repositories, domain services, and anti-pattern detection user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true --- # Tactical DDD Implementation patterns within a bounded context. Tactical DDD answers: "How do we structure the domain model?" ## Aggregates An aggregate is a consistency boundary -- a cluster of domain objects that must be transactionally consistent. ### Vernon's Four Design Rules 1. **Model true invariants in consistency boundaries**: Only include elements that MUST be consistent within the same transaction. If two entities don't share an invariant, they belong in separate aggregates. 2. **Design small aggregates**: ~70% of aggregates contain only a root entity with value-typed properties. Large aggregates create concurrency contention, scalability failures, and memory pressure. 3. **Reference other aggregates by identity**: Use `ProductId` not `Product`. Direct object references create accidental cross-aggregate transactions and prevent independent scaling. 4. **Use eventual consistency outside the boundary**: Domain events communicate across aggregates. One transaction = one aggregate. If you need to update two aggregates "atomically," reconsider your boundaries. ### Aggregate Design Checklist - [ ] Contains only elements sharing true invariants - [ ] Root entity controls all access (no direct child manipulation) - [ ] External references by ID only (no object graphs) - [ ] Small enough for single-transaction performance - [ ] Command produces events (in event-sourced systems) or mutates state (in traditional) - [ ] Business rules validated in command handling, not in persistence layer ### Common Aggregate Smells | Smell | Signal | Fix | |-------|--------|-----| | God Aggregate | >5 entities, frequent concurrency conflicts | Split by invariant analysis | | Anemic Aggregate | All logic in services, aggregate = data bag | Move business rules into aggregate methods | | Cross-Aggregate Transaction | Two aggregates modified in one DB transaction | Use domain events + eventual consistency | | Deep Nesting | Aggregate root -> entity -> entity -> value | Flatten; promote nested entities to own aggregates | | Missing Aggregate | Business rules scattered in application services | Identify invariant cluster, create aggregate | ## Entities Objects with identity that persists across state changes. An entity is the "same" entity even when all its attributes change (a person who changes name, address, and job is still the same person). **Design rules**: Identity is assigned once and never changes | Equality by identity, not attributes | Track lifecycle (created, modified, archived) | Place business rules that depend on identity here ## Value Objects Objects defined by their attributes, not identity. Two value objects with the same attributes are interchangeable. **Design rules**: - **Immutable**: Never modify; create new instances - **Self-validating**: Constructor rejects invalid state. If a `Money` object exists, it has a valid amount and currency - **Side-effect-free behavior**: Methods return new values, don't mutate - **Structural equality**: Compare by attributes, not reference **Examples**: Money(amount, currency) | Email(address) | DateRange(start, end) | Address(street, city, zip, country) | Temperature(value, unit) **Context sensitivity**: Whether something is Entity or Value Object depends on bounded context. Address is a VO in e-commerce (shipping destination) but an Entity in utility billing (service location with lifecycle). ## Domain Events Represent something that happened in the domain. Always past tense. ### Naming Convention | Correct (past tense) | Wrong (imperative) | |----------------------|-------------------| | OrderPlaced | PlaceOrder (that's a command) | | PaymentReceived | ReceivePayment | | UserRegistered | RegisterUser | | InventoryReserved | ReserveInventory | ### Event Design Guidelines - **Self-contained**: Include all data needed to understand what happened - **Domain language**: Business terms, not technical jargon - **One fact per event**: `OrderConfirmed` not `OrderStatusChanged` - **No behavior**: Events carry data only - **Granularity matters**: Too coarse (OrderUpdated) loses meaning; too fine (OrderFieldChanged) is a generic audit log ### Event Categories **Domain events** (in-process): Within a bounded context, dispatched via mediator. Collected during command handling, dispatched before/after commit. **Integration events** (distributed): Cross bounded-context via message brokers. Always asynchronous. Published only after successful persistence. May use different schema than domain events (translated at boundary). ## Repositories One repository per aggregate (not per entity). Interface defined in domain layer, implementation in infrastructure. **Collection-oriented**: add/remove/find -- repository tracks changes (Unit of Work pattern). Natural for ORMs. **Persistence-oriented**: explicit save/load -- caller manages lifecycle. Natural for document DBs and event-sourced systems. **Rules**: Never expose persistence details (SQL, JSON) to domain | Return domain objects, not DTOs | Query methods use domain language (findActiveOrders, not findByStatusEquals) ## Domain Services Stateless operations that span multiple aggregates or don't naturally belong to any single entity. **When to use**: Operation involves multiple aggregates | Logic doesn't belong to any entity | Named using ubiquitous language **Danger**: Overuse creates anemic domain models. First try to place the behavior on an entity or aggregate. Domain service is the last resort for truly cross-aggregate logic. | Domain Service | Application Service | |---------------|-------------------| | Domain logic (rules, calculations) | Orchestration (transaction, security, events) | | Domain types only | Domain + infrastructure ports | | Domain
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
1a864ec81cdefull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/nwave-ai__nw-ddd-tactical.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 1a864ec81cde | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Nw Ddd Tactical skill do?
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
Is Nw Ddd Tactical safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Nw Ddd Tactical access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (1a864ec81cde), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.