Atlas / Skills / nwave-ai / Nw Command Optimization Workflow

Nw Command Optimization WorkflowSAFE

skills/nwave-ai/nw-command-optimization-workflow

AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
617
01

Overview

AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.

Read from source at commit 1a864ec81cdeOBSERVED · 2026-10-14
Advertisement
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: nw-command-optimization-workflow
description: Step-by-step workflow for converting bloated command files to lean declarative definitions
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Command Optimization Workflow

## Overview

Convert oversized commands (500-2400 lines) to lean declarative definitions (40-300 lines) by removing duplication, extracting domain knowledge to agents, and adopting the forge.md pattern.

## Phase 1: Analyze

1. **Classify**: dispatcher, orchestrator, or simple
2. **Measure**: `wc -l` the file
3. **Identify content categories** (approximate %): parameter parsing/validation | Workflow/orchestration logic | Agent prompt templates | Examples/documentation | Error handling | Boilerplate (orchestrator briefing, agent registry)
4. **Flag reducible content**: Duplication from other commands (orchestrator briefing, agent registry, parameter parsing) | Domain knowledge belonging in agents (TDD phases, review criteria, methodology) | Dead code (deprecated formats, aspirational features, old signatures) | Verbose examples (JSON blocks exceeding 3 examples) | Aggressive language (count CRITICAL/MANDATORY/MUST)

## Phase 2: Extract

### 2a: Remove shared boilerplate
These blocks appear in 5-12 commands, extract to shared orchestrator preamble skill:
- "Sub-agents have NO ACCESS to Skill tool" briefing (~20-30 lines/file)
- Agent registry with capabilities (~15-20 lines/file)
- Parameter parsing rules (~10-15 lines/file)
- Pre-invocation validation checklist (~10-15 lines/file)
- "What NOT to include" blocks (~8-12 lines/file)

After extraction, command references preamble.

### 2b: Move domain knowledge to agents
If command contains HOW the agent works, move to agent definition or skill:
- TDD phase details -> nw-software-crafter | DIVIO templates -> nw-documentarist | Refactoring hierarchies -> nw-software-crafter | BDD/Gherkin -> nw-acceptance-designer | Review criteria -> reviewer agent | Mutation testing config -> nw-software-crafter

Command retains WHAT and success criteria. Agent owns HOW.

### 2c: Delete dead content
Remove: deprecated format references | Aspirational unimplemented features | Verbose JSON contradicting current format | BUILD:INJECT placeholders | Mixed-language comments

### 2d: Reduce aggressive language
- "CRITICAL: You MUST extract..." -> "Extract..."
- "MANDATORY: Use the Task tool" -> "Use the Task tool"
- "NON-NEGOTIABLE requirement" -> Remove adjective entirely

### 2e: Condense examples
Keep 2-3 canonical examples max. Each demonstrates distinct pattern (correct usage, edge case, common mistake).

## Phase 3: Restructure

Apply declarative command template (load `command-design-patterns` skill):
1. Header: wave, agent, overview
2. Context files required
3. Agent invocation with configuration
4. Success criteria
5. Next wave handoff
6. Expected outputs

For orchestrators, add Phases section between overview and agent invocation.

## Phase 4: Validate

- [ ] Under size target (dispatchers: 40-150, orchestrators: 100-300)
- [ ] No duplicated boilerplate
- [ ] No domain knowledge belonging in agents
- [ ] No aggressive language (CRITICAL/MANDATORY/MUST count = 0)
- [ ] 2-3 examples max
- [ ] No dead code or deprecated references
- [ ] Declarative structure (WHAT not HOW)
- [ ] Measurable success criteria
- [ ] Clear agent invocation pattern

## Phase 5: Measure and Report

Report before/after: Line count (target 60-80% reduction for large files) | Content categories removed/moved | Aggressive language removed | Dependencies created (shared preamble, agent skill additions)

## Special Case: develop.md (Mega-Orchestrator)

develop.md at 2,394 lines requires special handling:
1. Embeds 6+ sub-command workflows inline
2. Should reference sub-commands, not embed them
3. Orchestration logic (phase sequencing, resume) is legitimate -- keep it
4. Agent prompt templates for sub-commands -> replace with references
5. Target: 200-300 lines of pure orchestration

Approach: extract orchestration phases as lean sequence (which agent, which command, what context, what gate), remove all embedded sub-command content.

## Shared Orchestrator Preamble

Extract common orchestrator knowledge to single shared skill:
- Architectural constraint about sub-agent tool access
- Valid agent list with brief capabilities
- Standard parameter parsing rules
- Pre-invocation validation pattern
- Correct/wrong invocation examples (2 each)

Estimated: ~60-80 lines. Replaces ~620 lines duplicated across commands.
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-14 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 1a864ec81cdefull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/nwave-ai__nw-command-optimization-workflow.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-141a864ec81cdeSAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Nw Command Optimization Workflow skill do?

AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.

Is Nw Command Optimization Workflow safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Nw Command Optimization Workflow access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (1a864ec81cde), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement