Atlas / Skills / lijigang / Ljg Map

Ljg MapSAFE

skills/lijigang/ljg-map
Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
1.0.1
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
7,571
01

Overview

An agent skill published by lijigang.

Read from source at commit 5e812fe3c3a4OBSERVED · 2026-10-28
Advertisement
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: ljg-map
description: 以《学习观》的知识观洞察用户文稿,提炼概念、判别依据与有条件的联结,按文稿自身的关系绘制通俗的形式化知识地图;每个节点都有白话定义、短公式和具体语义,图形不预设层级。USE WHEN 用户调用 /ljg-map,或要求把文章、笔记、讲稿画成形式化地图、思考地形图、概念判别与关系图。NOT FOR 普通摘要、逐段改写、地理地图或单独的公式证明。
metadata:
  version: "1.0.1"
---

# ljg-map · 形式化思考地图

用《学习观》关于概念、判别模型和联结模型的理解,看到文稿背后的知识结构:哪些词有明确的所指,现实对象凭什么归入它们,概念之间的关系在什么条件下成立。把看到的结构画出来,形式化负责减少歧义,白话和实例负责让关系可理解、可使用。

## Workflow Routing

| 请求 | 执行 |
|---|---|
| 从文稿生成地图,或修订已有地图 | 阅读 [Workflows/Map.md](Workflows/Map.md) |
| 需要校准公式密度、节点解释和来源边界 | 按需阅读 [Examples.md](Examples.md);学习表达方式,不套用题材和节点 |

## Gotchas

- **知识观是洞察视角,图形由材料决定。** 具象、概念与应用的对应帮助检查知识是否接通,不构成固定的三个图层、三个栏目或必经步骤。分类交叉就画交叉关系,反馈就画循环;材料确有层级时才画层级。
- **节点来自当前文稿。** 不把任何文章都画成「经验—抽象—概念—记忆—学习」;只有文章本身讨论这些概念时,它们才成为内容节点。判别、验证可以写在边或节点解释里,无须一律占框。
- **地图不是换成公式的长文。** 成品先让读者看见承重关系,再解释图里的节点。不能只给概念清单、长表格或一串没有地图的公式。
- **形式化不以符号数量计。** 优先「中文名称 + 短公式」。定义符号后再使用,不另造一套图论元语言来描述本来很简单的文章。
- **分类与预测分开。** 「有圆圈」可以定义一类;「这一类会加分」是另一条需要依据的关系。满足分类条件不自动证明预测成立,也不能推出反面类别有反面结果。
- **箭头有语义。** 定义、归类、计算、相关、因果、类比、推断和反馈不能混作一种关系;用短边标签和必要条件区分。猜想仍标猜想。
- **图的完整不能靠编造。** 文稿缺少判别标准、实例或验证办法,就在对应位置标缺口。补充的教学例子、应用设想与可行性判断要与原文陈述分清。

## 成品约定

默认直接在对话中交付 Markdown、Mermaid 和可读公式。用户要求保存、特定格式或修改已有产物时,按其指定交付;本技能不默认写笔记、覆盖原文或发布。

主图显出这篇文稿特有的知识关系,不预设层数、形状或统一应用流程。主要关系保持易读,次要分支可以放到有连接位置的补图或标记表。每个图中节点均能在解释中找到相同编号或名称,以及定义、公式、语义和具体对应。

## Examples

- `/ljg-map <文稿或文件路径>`:读到实际内容后,画出该文稿的知识结构,解释每个节点,用合适的具体对应讲清关键关系。
- `把这篇文章的概念、判别和联结画清楚,别改写文章`:保留作者的主要推理、并列结构及重要分歧;在箭头处标明条件和来源中的不确定性。
- `这张图太难懂,重新画`:减少符号和主图拥挤度,用一个合适例子贯穿;保留会改变判断的条件,不以删掉论点换取表面简洁。
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-28 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 5e812fe3c3a4full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/lijigang__ljg-map.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-285e812fe3c3a4SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

Is ljg-map — lijigang/ljg-skills safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can ljg-map — lijigang/ljg-skills access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (5e812fe3c3a4), read on 2026-10-28. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Add this badge to your README

Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.

ModelsAtlas audit badge

Markdown
[![ModelsAtlas audit: Ljg Map](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/lijigang/ljg-map/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/lijigang/ljg-map/)

Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.

Advertisement