Starter Kit UpgradeSAFE
Laravel official collection of agent skills
Overview
Laravel official collection of agent skills
93e4d0a634e6OBSERVED · 2026-10-13What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: starter-kit-upgrade description: Selectively pull upstream improvements from a Laravel starter kit (laravel/vue-starter-kit, laravel/react-starter-kit, laravel/svelte-starter-kit, laravel/livewire-starter-kit) into a project bootstrapped from one. Use when the user wants to update, sync, or migrate features from their starter kit. Applies one feature at a time on a dedicated branch; never auto-merges customized files. --- # Laravel Starter Kit Upgrade - Users bootstrap from `laravel/vue-starter-kit`, `react-starter-kit`, `svelte-starter-kit`, or `livewire-starter-kit`, then customize. They own the code. - We pick **specific features** from upstream (e.g. "toast notifications", "2FA autofocus fix"), not "version upgrades." - The user's git history is unrelated to the kit's. There is no common ancestor. We compare user-now vs upstream-now, byte by byte. - We never auto-merge a customized file. Customizations are surfaced; the user decides. - Behavior preservation is the contract: the user's currently-passing tests/typecheck/build must still pass after. ## Safety contract: non-negotiable Read these to the user before any side effects, and live by them throughout: 1. Working tree must be clean. If `git status --porcelain` is non-empty, refuse and tell the user to commit or stash. Do not "stash for them." 2. All work happens on a dedicated branch (`starter-kit-upgrade/<short-id>`). The user's current branch is never modified. 3. Each applied feature is its own commit. That is how revertability works. 4. Never auto-resolve conflicts. A change touching customized code is surfaced; default action is to skip the file. 5. Never silently overwrite manifests or lockfiles (`composer.json`, `package.json`, `*-lock.*`). Show diffs; let the user decide. 6. Verify behavior preservation. Re-run the user's tests/typecheck/build after applying. A previously-passing check that now fails is a regression. Stop, surface, recommend revert. 7. Detect from unambiguous signals; ask when ambiguous. Concrete evidence (e.g. `config/fortify.php` exists) is fine. Picking a likely answer when signals are mixed or absent is not. If any of these is violated, abort with a clear message about what went wrong and how to recover. ## Required tools - `git` (in the user's project) - `gh` (authenticated; `gh auth status` returns OK) - `jq` (used by `run_tests.sh`) - `bash` (for the bundled scripts) If any is missing, stop in Phase 4 and tell the user how to install. ## Gotchas Environment-specific behavior the agent will get wrong without being told. Read these before starting the workflow and apply throughout. - **Parallel implementations.** When a feature has `new` files plus `differs` to call sites, the user may already have an in-house equivalent (their own toast helper, validation rule, etc.). Surface as a whole; don't apply the `new` files in isolation as if they're "safe." Default action is to skip the entire feature; the user can opt to adopt upstream's version and remove theirs later. - **Renamed paths.** If a `new` path's basename or class name already exists elsewhere in the user's repo, the user has likely renamed/moved it. Surface, don't auto-apply, or you'll create a duplicate. Show them the upstream change and let them apply it to their renamed file by hand or wait for user confirmation. - **Later upstream edits.** Copying upstream HEAD pulls in _every_ commit since the feature, not just the feature's own changes. Always run the Phase 5 step 2 check before applying. When later edits exist, scope to `<sha>:<path>` instead of `HEAD:<path>`. - **Transitive imports.** New files often `import` from helpers that are NOT in the same feature commit (Vue/React/Svelte: `@/lib/...`, `@/components/...`; Livewire: `@include`, `<x-...>`, `<livewire:...>`). Phase 5 step 4 covers the scan; never declare a feature applied without it. Uncovered imports show up as runtime/compile errors. - **Lockfile drift.** Manifests are user-curated. Never overwrite. Walk the user through the upstream diff, let them merge, then regenerate lockfiles via the package manager (Phase 6). - **Stale node_modules after major bumps.** After Vite v7 → v8, React 18 → 19, etc., `npm install` often fails with `ERESOLVE`. Clean and reinstall (Phase 6). - **New migrations.** When upstream adds migrations (e.g. "Catch migrations up to Skeleton"), surface them separately. Recommend `php artisan migrate:status` first; applying a new migration on a populated DB can fail loudly. - **Major framework bumps as features.** Things like Laravel 12 → 13, Livewire 3 → 4, or Inertia v2 → v3 are too large and too breaking for the feature-by-feature flow. Do not attempt them through this skill. Instead, prompt the user to run the corresponding [Laravel Boost](https://github.com/laravel/boost) MCP slash command first, then come back and re-run this skill against the resulting (clean-tree) repo. If Boost is not yet installed: `composer require laravel/boost --dev && php artisan boost:install` (requires Boost `^2.0`). Slash commands: - Laravel 12 → 13: `/upgrade-laravel-v13` - Livewire 3 → 4: `/upgrade-livewire-v4` - Inertia v2 → v3: `/upgrade-inertia-v3` - **Already-present features.** If Phase 2's pre-filter missed it and Phase 5's classifier reports every file as `already-present`, skip the feature with a note: "every file matches upstream's current; moving on." Don't commit an empty commit. - **More than ~50 `differs`.** The per-file walkthrough is too tedious to be useful at that scale. Stop, recommend manual upgrade for that feature. ## Workflow Eight phases, in order. Each phase establishes invariants the next relies on. ### Phase 1: Identify the kit and branch variant Inspect the user's project: | | vue | react | svelte | livewire | | --------------
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass, no_license.
93e4d0a634e6full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/laravel__starter-kit-upgrade.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | 93e4d0a634e6 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Starter Kit Upgrade skill do?
Laravel official collection of agent skills
Is Starter Kit Upgrade safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Starter Kit Upgrade access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (93e4d0a634e6), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.