Common Protocol EnforcementSAFE
A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages
Overview
A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages
6f5be687a268OBSERVED · 2026-10-14What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: common-protocol-enforcement
description: Enforce Red-Team verification and adversarial protocol audit. Use only when verifying completion, performing self-scans, or checking protocol violations; do not activate for ordinary implementation, configuration, or unit-test requests.
metadata:
triggers:
keywords:
- verify done
- protocol check
- self-scan
- pre-write audit
- task complete
- audit violations
- retrospective
- scan
- red-team
---
# Protocol Enforcement (Red-Team Verification)
## **Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)**
## Red-Team Verification Protocol
Before declaring any task "done" or calling `notify_user`:
1. **Adversarial Audit**: Search for Standard Defaults where project rules should exist.
2. **Protocol Check**: Confirm active skills and workflows were loaded before writing.
3. **Evidence Check**: Ask what observable command or artifact proves the completion claim.
4. **Execution Bias Check**: Ask whether speed or convenience skipped a structural rule.
## Risk-Based Post-Write Self-Scan
Trigger a post-write self-scan under specific risk or freshness conditions:
- **Condition**: State freshness is uncertain, external modifications occurred, tool output indicated partial edits or conflicts, or changes touch sensitive paths (auth, security, payments, data integrity).
- **Scan**: Inspect the diff or touched section rather than ritualistic re-reading of entire files.
- **Match**: Check against `Anti-Patterns` in all active skills.
- **Fix**: Re-edit immediately if a violation is detected.
## Red Flags
- **Stop if "done" appears before fresh verification**: Require observable evidence (test output, diff check, diagnostic artifact).
- **Stop if assuming stale file state is intact**: Verify source of truth when freshness is uncertain or tools signal ambiguity.
- **Stop if the shortcut is "small enough to skip protocol"**: Small changes hide drift.
## Rationalization Prevention
- **"The change is tiny"**: Tiny changes still violate guardrails.
- **"The test passed earlier"**: Old evidence does not prove current state.
- **"I know the pattern already"**: Verify active project rules anyway.
## Anti-Patterns
- **No "Done" Bias**: Functional success does not equal protocol success without proof.
- **No Unconditional Reread Loops**: Inspect diffs and files conditionally on risk and freshness, not on every tool call.
- **No Skipping Protocols**: "Small changes" are where most violations happen.
- **No Unobservable Completion**: Completion claims must be backed by executed commands or inspectable artifacts.
## Execution Bias Detection
Look for:
- Local mocks instead of shared fakes.
- Hardcoded styles instead of design tokens.
- Try-catch blocks without standard error handling.
- Missing `Pre-Write Audit Log` in thoughts.Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6f5be687a268full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/hoangnguyen0403__common-protocol-enforcement.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 6f5be687a268 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Common Protocol Enforcement skill do?
A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages
Is Common Protocol Enforcement safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Common Protocol Enforcement access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6f5be687a268), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.