Atlas / Skills / hoangnguyen0403 / Common Mobile Visual Testing

Common Mobile Visual TestingSAFE

skills/hoangnguyen0403/common-mobile-visual-testing

A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
575
01

Overview

A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages

Read from source at commit 6f5be687a268OBSERVED · 2026-10-14
Advertisement
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: common-mobile-visual-testing
description: Standardizes mobile UI audits, performance/scroll checks, RTL verification, and state-specific testing on iOS/Android.
metadata:
  triggers:
    keywords:
    - visual test
    - mobile test
    - verify ui
    - dark mode test
    - accessibility audit
    - behavioral test
    - visual regression
    - localization test
---

# 🕵 Mobile Visual & Behavioral Testing

## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**

> [!IMPORTANT]
> **Tier 2 (Methodology)**: Strategy mobile UI/UX audit.
> **Tier 3 (Domain)**: i18n, A11y (Dynamic Type), Platform (Notch/RTL).

## 🧪 Testing Mindset

Analyze diff + answer:
1.  **Change?** (Affected screen, logic path)
2.  **Break?** (Regression, state transition)
3.  **Visual Audit**: Truncate, align, z-order, color.
4.  **Behavioral Audit**: Tap target, nav, data accuracy.

## 📋 Scenario Matrix

| Change Type | Scenarios to Run |
| :--- | :--- |
| **UI/Styling** | Visual Audit + Dark Mode + QoS Check (CPU/Mem) |
| **Navigation** | User Flow + Deep Link + Z-Order |
| **Lists/Grids** | Scroll Test + Pagination + Empty State |
| **i18n/Locale** | RTL + Truncate + Locale Logic |
| **Accessibility** | Dynamic Type + High Contrast + Permission Reason |

## 🛠️ Core Tool Mapping

| Scenario | Appium Tool |
| :--- | :--- |
| **System Alert** | `appium_alert` (check hierarchy first) |
| **Performance** | `appium_mobile_performance_data` (monitor during flow) |
| **Visual Check** | `appium_screenshot` (base/diff) |
| **Layout Audit** | `appium_get_page_source` (hierarchy/aria) |

## 🚫 Anti-Patterns

- **Ignore QoS**: Apps crash/lag under load. **MUST** check and report **QoS** from `appium_mobile_performance_data` (scroll/video).
- **Blind Tap**: Check state before interact. Use `appium_screenshot`.
- **Alert Paralysis**: Unexpected alert? Use `appium_alert` → `accept`/`dismiss`.
- **Happy-Path Bias**: Never ignore Empty, Loading, or Error state.
- **Deep Link Neglect**: Verify "Cold Start" via deep link.
- **Single-Device Tunnel Vision**: Verify smallest/largest screen size.

## 📁 Evidence

`.appium-mcp/<session>/` holds `<AC|step>-<before|after>.png`, `<label>.source.xml`, `perf.json` (QoS proof), `video.url`. Driver rung and dir go in the walkthrough `driver:` / `evidence_dir:` lines.

## 🔗 References

- **appium-mcp**: [appium-mcp](../../quality-engineering/quality-engineering-appium-mcp/SKILL.md)
- **Driver Ladder**: [driver-ladder](../../quality-engineering/quality-engineering-appium-mcp/references/driver-ladder.md) — local then cloud, BLOCKED rule.
- **Scenario Details**: [scenarios](references/scenarios.md)
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-14 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 6f5be687a268full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/hoangnguyen0403__common-mobile-visual-testing.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-146f5be687a268SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Common Mobile Visual Testing skill do?

A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages

Is Common Mobile Visual Testing safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Common Mobile Visual Testing access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6f5be687a268), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement