Android ToolingSAFE
A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages
Overview
A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages
6f5be687a268OBSERVED · 2026-10-14What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: android-tooling
description: Configure Android static analysis with Detekt, Ktlint, and Android Lint for CI/CD quality gates. Use for Android-specific lint and quality tooling; defer generic Java Checkstyle, SonarQube, and standalone CI configuration.
metadata:
triggers:
files:
- 'build.gradle.kts'
- 'detekt.yml'
- '.detekt/config.yml'
keywords:
- detekt
- ktlint
- lint
- "@Suppress"
- abortOnError
- jlleitschuh
---
# Android Tooling Standards
## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**
## Implementation Guidelines
### Static Analysis
- **Detekt**: Enforce code complexity rules (LongMethod, LargeClass). Fail build on high complexity.
- **Ktlint**: Enforce formatting style (Indent, Spacing). Use `jlleitschuh` plugin.
- **Android Lint**: Treat warnings as errors in CI (`abortOnError = true`).
### CI Gates
- **Pre-commit**: Run lightweight checks (formatting) locally.
- **Pipeline**: Run full checks (Detekt + Lint + Unit Tests) on Pull Request.
## Anti-Patterns
- **No @Suppress in Production**: Fix Detekt/lint violation at source.
- **No Manual Formatting**: Let Ktlint handle it — configure auto-format on save in IDE.
## References
- [Configuration](references/implementation.md)Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6f5be687a268full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/hoangnguyen0403__android-tooling.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | 6f5be687a268 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Android Tooling skill do?
A collection of Agent Skills Standard and Best Practice for Programming Languages, Frameworks that help our AI Agent follow best practies on frameworks and programming laguages
Is Android Tooling safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Android Tooling access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6f5be687a268), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.