Django ModelsCAUTION
Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
Overview
Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
42a3375c14f5OBSERVED · 2026-09-29What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: django-models
description: Design Django ORM models for Sentry following architectural conventions for silos, replication, relocation, and foreign keys. Use when adding a new Django model, designing a model for a feature, deciding where data should live, picking a foreign key type, or refactoring an existing model's silo placement. Trigger on "add a Django model", "create a model", "design a model for X", "new database table", "store this data in the DB", "I need to track Y", "model for [feature]". Not for Pydantic models, dataclasses, ML models, or Protobuf — this is specifically for Django ORM models in the Sentry codebase.
---
# Sentry Model Conventions
This skill captures the _architectural_ decisions that go into a Sentry model. It does not cover Django syntax, import order, or migration generation — for those:
- Migrations: invoke the `generate-migration` skill after the model is designed.
- Outbox replication plumbing (signal receivers, payload shapes, deletion handlers): invoke the `hybrid-cloud-outboxes` skill.
- Hybrid cloud RPCs: invoke the `hybrid-cloud-rpc` skill.
## The four decisions that define a Sentry model
Before writing any fields, decide all four. They are coupled — getting one wrong forces a follow-up migration to fix the others.
### 1. Which silo does this data live in?
Cell silo (`@cell_silo_model`) is the default. Use control silo (`@control_silo_model`) only when the data is shared across organizations or has to be strongly consistent with other control-silo resources (auth, integration installs, API tokens, slug reservations).
The wrong way to think about it: "this is a user-facing thing, so control." The right way: "what is the smallest silo where this can correctly live, and is that silo the same as everything that mutates it together?" If a cell never reads it, it does not belong in the cell.
### 2. Does the other silo need to see this data?
If yes, the model must inherit from `ReplicatedCellModel` (cell-side) or `ReplicatedControlModel` (control-side) and set `category: ClassVar[OutboxCategory] = OutboxCategory.MY_THING`. The base `Model` class is for data that genuinely never crosses the silo boundary.
Replication is part of the _design_, not a thing you bolt on later. If you have to ask "should other silo X be able to look this up by ID without an RPC?" — that is a replication decision, and it changes the base class. When in doubt, defer to the `hybrid-cloud-outboxes` skill before finalizing the model.
### 3. Is this data part of an organization export (relocation)?
Every concrete model must set `__relocation_scope__` — the runtime check at `src/sentry/db/models/base.py` raises if missing. The choice is almost always one of:
| Scope | When |
| ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| `RelocationScope.Organization` | Customer data tied to an org that should travel with the org during a relocation. Includes most projects, settings, members, dashboards, alerts. |
| `RelocationScope.Excluded` | Transient data, telemetry, caches, system-internal state, anything in the `getsentry` app, or data not meaningful in another instance. |
A `set` of scopes with a `get_relocation_scope()` override exists but is rare; reach for it only when relocation behavior is per-instance conditional. `Excluded` cannot be part of a set.
If you are not sure: most new models that store a customer's working state are `Organization`; most new models that exist for Sentry's operations (queues, caches, attempts, jobs, feature flags consumed at runtime) are `Excluded`.
### 4. What is the cross-silo blast radius of each foreign key?
The FK type is an architectural statement, not a style choice:
- `FlexibleForeignKey("sentry.Project", on_delete=...)` — the FK target lives in the same silo. A real database constraint is created. Cascading delete is enforced by Postgres.
- `HybridCloudForeignKey("sentry.User", on_delete="...", ...)` — the FK target lives in the _opposite_ silo. No database constraint. Cascade is eventually consistent via outbox tombstones. `on_delete` is passed as a string (`"CASCADE"`, `"SET_NULL"`, `"DO_NOTHING"`). Name the field with an explicit `_id` suffix (e.g. `user_id = HybridCloudForeignKey(...)`) since there's no ORM relationship to resolve — only an ID. Compare with `FlexibleForeignKey`, where Django gives you both `project` (the related object) and `project_id` (the column) from a single `project = FlexibleForeignKey(...)`.
- Plain Django `ForeignKey` — avoid. A couple of older `workflow_engine` models still use it, but for new code the convention is `FlexibleForeignKey` (same-silo) or `HybridCloudForeignKey` (cross-silo). Both plug into Sentry's deletion framework and hybrid-cloud plumbing in ways plain `ForeignKey` does not.
If a model has both kinds of FKs, that is fine and common. The presence of an HCFK is _not_ a signal that the model should be in the other silo — it just means the relationship crosses silos.
## Other norms worth encoding
### Base class and timestamps
Use `DefaultFieldsModel` for new models. It gives you `date_added` (`auto_now_add=True`) and `date_updated` (`auto_now=True`) for free, and it's almost always what you want — tables that genuinely shouldn't track either timestamp are rare. `DefaultFieldsModelExisting` is legacy-only — its docstring explicitly says don't use it on new models (it leaves `date_added` nullable for backward compat with models that predate the field).
### Field-type intent
- `BoundedBigAutoField` for primary keys, `BoundedBigIntegerField` / `BoundedPositiveIntegerField` for non-PK numeric IDs and counts. The "bounded" part is a runtime overflow guard, not a Django nicetyTrust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (2)
.claude/skills
api-docs/.node-version
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
42a3375c14f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/getsentry__django-models.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | 42a3375c14f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Django Models skill do?
Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
Is Django Models safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 2 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Django Models access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (42a3375c14f5), read on 2026-09-29. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.