Ralph Review TrioSAFE

A single hub to find Claude Skills, Agents, Commands, Hooks, Plugins, and Marketplace collections to extend Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Agent SDK and OpenClaw

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: ralph-review-trio
description: Run a sequential three-tier code review on a finished implementation branch — Haiku (surface) → Sonnet (logic) → Opus (deep). Restarts from Tier 1 on any tier failure. Use when a solo branch or PR is code-complete and you want structured pre-merge verification before human review.
---

# Ralph Review Trio

This skill triggers `/ralph-review`, which runs three sequential reviewer subagents at increasing depth. If any tier flags a failure, the loop restarts from Tier 1 after fixes.

## When to trigger

- An implementation is code-complete on a feature / solo branch.
- All acceptance criteria for the underlying issue are believed satisfied.
- Pre-merge verification is needed before human review or merge-to-main.
- You want structured evidence that each tier's checklist was walked.

## When NOT to trigger

- Work-in-progress branches mid-implementation — Ralph assumes the change is complete.
- Documentation-only diffs with no code — Tier 2/3 still run but most checks short-circuit to "doc-only PR" exemption; overkill for a single README edit.
- Hotfix branches where speed dominates verification — use the project's normal PR review.

## How it works

```
/ralph-review
    │
    ▼
  Tier 1  — Haiku  (surface checks)   ─── fail ──> restart
    │  pass
    ▼
  Tier 2  — Sonnet (logic checks)     ─── fail ──> restart
    │  pass
    ▼
  Tier 3  — Opus   (deep analysis)    ─── fail ──> restart
    │  pass
    ▼
  RALPH_PASS  →  merge OK
```

A `<promise>HAIKU_PASS</promise>` / `<promise>SONNET_PASS</promise>` / `<promise>OPUS_PASS</promise>` token is emitted by each tier on pass. All three required for overall pass.

## Entry point

`/ralph-review` — defined in `../../commands/ralph-review.md`.

## Per-tier checklists

- `../../agents/haiku-reviewer.md` — Tier 1 surface checklist
- `../../agents/sonnet-reviewer.md` — Tier 2 logic checklist
- `../../agents/opus-reviewer.md` — Tier 3 deep-analysis checklist

Extended reference content under `references/` (same dir as this SKILL.md) is loaded on demand by each tier when a specific check requires more context.

## Outputs

Each tier writes a fenced `## RESULT` block with:

```
## RESULT
mcp_graph_available: yes|no      # first line when discussing graph queries
verdict: pass|fail|unknown
files_touched: [paths]
findings: [{path, line, claim, evidence}]
scope_gaps: [list or "none"]
```

The main agent reads the RESULT block and decides next action (restart, next tier, or PASS).

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.