T1584 Compromise InfrastructureCAUTION

Open-source AI-powered offensive security harness for automated penetration testing.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: "T1584_compromise-infrastructure"
description: "Adversaries may compromise third-party infrastructure that can be used during targeting."
category: "information-gathering"
version: "18.1"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
  - mitre-attack
  - enterprise
  - t1584
  - resource-development
  - pre
technique_id: "T1584"
tactic: "resource-development"
all_tactics:
  - resource-development
platforms:
  - PRE
mitre_url: "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584"
tech_stack:
  - pre
cwe_ids: []
chains_with:
  - T1584.001
  - T1584.002
  - T1584.003
  - T1584.004
  - T1584.005
  - T1584.006
  - T1584.007
  - T1584.008
prerequisites: []
severity_boost:
  T1584.001: "Chain with T1584.001 for deeper attack path"
  T1584.002: "Chain with T1584.002 for deeper attack path"
  T1584.003: "Chain with T1584.003 for deeper attack path"
---

# T1584 Compromise Infrastructure

## High-Level Description

Adversaries may compromise third-party infrastructure that can be used during targeting. Infrastructure solutions include physical or cloud servers, domains, network devices, and third-party web and DNS services. Instead of buying, leasing, or renting infrastructure an adversary may compromise infrastructure and use it during other phases of the adversary lifecycle. Additionally, adversaries may compromise numerous machines to form a botnet they can leverage.

Use of compromised infrastructure allows adversaries to stage, launch, and execute operations. Compromised infrastructure can help adversary operations blend in with traffic that is seen as normal, such as contact with high reputation or trusted sites. For example, adversaries may leverage compromised infrastructure (potentially also in conjunction with Digital Certificates) to further blend in and support staged information gathering and/or Phishing campaigns. Adversaries may also compromise numerous machines to support Proxy and/or proxyware services or to form a botnet. Additionally, adversaries may compromise infrastructure residing in close proximity to a target in order to gain Initial Access via Wi-Fi Networks.

By using compromised infrastructure, adversaries may enable follow-on malicious operations. Prior to targeting, adversaries may also compromise the infrastructure of other adversaries.

## Kill Chain Phase

- Resource Development (TA0042)

**Platforms:** PRE

## What to Check

- [ ] Identify if Compromise Infrastructure technique is applicable to target environment
- [ ] Check PRE systems for indicators of Compromise Infrastructure
- [ ] Verify mitigations are bypassed or absent (1 known mitigations)
- [ ] Assess detection coverage (1 detection strategies)

## How to Test

### Manual Testing

1. **Identify Attack Surface**: Determine if the target environment is susceptible to Compromise Infrastructure by examining the target platforms (PRE).

2. **Assess Existing Defenses**: Review whether mitigations for T1584 are in place. If defenses are absent or misconfigured, this technique may be exploitable.

3. **Execute Test**: Use tools and methods described in the MITRE ATT&CK page and external references below.

> **Note**: No Atomic Red Team tests available for this technique. See [Atomic Red Team GitHub](https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team) for updates.

## Remediation Guide

### M1056 Pre-compromise

This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls.

## Detection

### Detection of Compromise Infrastructure

## Risk Assessment

| Finding                                        | Severity | Impact               |
| ---------------------------------------------- | -------- | -------------------- |
| Compromise Infrastructure technique applicable | High     | Resource Development |

## CWE Categories

| CWE ID | Title                 |
| ------ | --------------------- |
| N/A    | No direct CWE mapping |

## References

- [amnesty_nso_pegasus](https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2021/07/forensic-methodology-report-how-to-catch-nso-groups-pegasus/)
- [Sysdig Proxyjacking](https://sysdig.com/blog/proxyjacking-attackers-log4j-exploited/)
- [FireEye DNS Hijack 2019](https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2019/01/global-dns-hijacking-campaign-dns-record-manipulation-at-scale.html)
- [ICANNDomainNameHijacking](https://www.icann.org/en/ssac/registration-services/documents/sac-007-domain-name-hijacking-incidents-threats-risks-and-remediation-12-07-2005-en)
- [Koczwara Beacon Hunting Sep 2021](https://michaelkoczwara.medium.com/cobalt-strike-c2-hunting-with-shodan-c448d501a6e2)
- [Nearest Neighbor Volexity](https://www.volexity.com/blog/2024/11/22/the-nearest-neighbor-attack-how-a-russian-apt-weaponized-nearby-wi-fi-networks-for-covert-access/)
- [Mandiant APT1](https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/services/pdfs/mandiant-apt1-report.pdf)
- [Talos DNSpionage Nov 2018](https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2018/11/dnspionage-campaign-targets-middle-east.html)
- [NSA NCSC Turla OilRig](https://media.defense.gov/2019/Oct/18/2002197242/-1/-1/0/NSA_CSA_Turla_20191021%20ver%204%20-%20nsa.gov.pdf)
- [Mandiant SCANdalous Jul 2020](https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/scandalous-external-detection-using-network-scan-data-and-automation/)
- [ThreatConnect Infrastructure Dec 2020](https://threatconnect.com/blog/infrastructure-research-hunting/)
- [FireEye EPS Awakens Part 2](https://web.archive.org/web/20151226205946/https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2015/12/the-eps-awakens-part-two.html)
- [Atomic Red Team - T1584](https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/tree/master/atomics/T1584)
- [MITRE ATT&CK - T1584](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584)

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (5)

packages/app/public/apple-touch-icon-v3.png

packages/app/public/apple-touch-icon.png

packages/app/public/favicon-96x96-v3.png

packages/app/public/favicon-96x96.png

packages/app/public/favicon-v3.ico

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

[![ModelsAtlas audit: T1584 Compromise Infrastructure](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/cyberstrikeus/t1584-compromise-infrastructure/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/cyberstrikeus/t1584-compromise-infrastructure/)

Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.