T0880 Loss Of SafetyCAUTION
Open-source AI-powered offensive security harness for automated penetration testing.
Overview
Open-source AI-powered offensive security harness for automated penetration testing.
eaf7d03223fcOBSERVED · 2026-10-18What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: "T0880_loss-of-safety"
description: "Adversaries may compromise safety system functions designed to maintain safe operation of a process when unacceptable or dangerous conditions occur."
category: "business-logic"
version: "18.1"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- mitre-attack
- ics
- t0880
- impact
technique_id: "T0880"
tactic: "impact"
all_tactics:
- impact
platforms:
- ICS
mitre_url: "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T0880"
tech_stack:
- ics
cwe_ids:
- CWE-400
chains_with: []
prerequisites: []
severity_boost: {}
---
# T0880 Loss of Safety
## High-Level Description
Adversaries may compromise safety system functions designed to maintain safe operation of a process when unacceptable or dangerous conditions occur. Safety systems are often composed of the same elements as control systems but have the sole purpose of ensuring the process fails in a predetermined safe manner.
Many unsafe conditions in process control happen too quickly for a human operator to react to. Speed is critical in correcting these conditions to limit serious impacts such as Loss of Control and Property Damage.
Adversaries may target and disable safety system functions as a prerequisite to subsequent attack execution or to allow for future unsafe conditionals to go unchecked. Detection of a Loss of Safety by operators can result in the shutdown of a process due to strict policies regarding safety systems. This can cause a Loss of Productivity and Revenue and may meet the technical goals of adversaries seeking to cause process disruptions.
## Kill Chain Phase
- Impact (TA0105)
**Platforms:** ICS
## What to Check
- [ ] Identify if Loss of Safety technique is applicable to target ICS environment
- [ ] Check ICS/SCADA systems for indicators of Loss of Safety
- [ ] Verify mitigations are bypassed or absent (2 known mitigations)
- [ ] Assess detection coverage (1 detection strategies)
## How to Test
### Identify Attack Surface
Determine if the target ICS/SCADA environment is susceptible to Loss of Safety by examining operational technology systems and network architecture.
### Assess Existing Defenses
Review whether mitigations for T0880 are in place. If defenses are absent or misconfigured, this technique may be exploitable in the ICS environment.
## Remediation Guide
### M0812 Safety Instrumented Systems
Ensure that all SIS are segmented from operational networks to prevent them from being targeted by additional adversarial behavior.
### M0805 Mechanical Protection Layers
Protection devices should have minimal digital components to prevent exposure to related adversarial techniques. Examples include interlocks, rupture disks, release valves, etc.
## Detection
### Detection of Loss of Safety
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ----------------------------------- | -------- | ------ |
| Loss of Safety technique applicable | High | Impact |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------- | --------------------------------- |
| CWE-400 | Uncontrolled Resource Consumption |
## References
- [MITRE ATT&CK ICS - T0880](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T0880)Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
packages/app/public/apple-touch-icon-v3.png
packages/app/public/apple-touch-icon.png
packages/app/public/favicon-96x96-v3.png
packages/app/public/favicon-96x96.png
packages/app/public/favicon-v3.ico
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
eaf7d03223fcfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/cyberstrikeus__t0880_loss-of-safety.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-18 | eaf7d03223fc | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the T0880 Loss Of Safety skill do?
Open-source AI-powered offensive security harness for automated penetration testing.
Is T0880 Loss Of Safety safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can T0880 Loss Of Safety access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (eaf7d03223fc), read on 2026-10-18. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.
Add this badge to your README
Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/cyberstrikeus/t0880-loss-of-safety/)
Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.