Cis Nginx V300 5 3 2CAUTION
Open-source AI-powered offensive security harness for automated penetration testing.
Overview
Open-source AI-powered offensive security harness for automated penetration testing.
eaf7d03223fcOBSERVED · 2026-10-18What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: cis-nginx-v300-5-3-2
description: "Ensure that Content Security Policy (CSP) is enabled and configured properly (Manual)"
category: cis-nginx
version: "3.0"
author: cyberstrike-official
tags: [cis, nginx, web-server, reverse-proxy, browser-security, request-filtering]
cis_id: "5.3.2"
cis_benchmark: "CIS NGINX Benchmark v3.0.0"
tech_stack: [nginx, linux, web-server]
cwe_ids: []
chains_with: []
prerequisites: []
severity_boost: {}
---
# CIS 5.3.2 — Ensure that Content Security Policy (CSP) is enabled and configured properly
## Profile Applicability
- Level 2 - Webserver
## Description
**C**ontent **S**ecurity **P**olicy (CSP) is an HTTP response header that allows site administrators to declare approved sources of content that browsers are allowed to load on that page. It is a mechanism to detect and mitigate certain types of attacks, including **C**ross-**S**ite **S**cripting (XSS) and data injection attacks. Furthermore, CSP's `frame-ancestors` directive is the modern replacement for the `X-Frame-Options` header to prevent Clickjacking.
## Rationale
A robust CSP significantly reduces the attack surface of a web application. By restricting the domains from which scripts, styles, images, and other resources **can be loaded**, it effectively neutralizes many XSS vectors. Additionally, by using the `frame-ancestors` directive, it explicitly controls **which parent pages are allowed to embed the application** (e.g., via `<iframe>`), providing a more flexible protection against Clickjacking than the legacy `X-Frame-Options` header.
## Impact
Implementing a strict CSP is complex and carries **a high risk of breaking application functionality**. **If a legitimate resource** (e.g., a CDN script, a font file, or an inline script) **is not whitelisted**, the browser will block it, potentially making the site unusable. CSP implementation should always start in "Report-Only" mode (`Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only`) to gather violation reports before enforcing the policy.
## Audit Procedure
**1. Run the following command to inspect the CSP configuration:**
```bash
nginx -T 2>/dev/null | grep -i 'Content-Security-Policy'
```
**2. Evaluate the policy:**
- Is the header present?
- Does it include at least a restrictive `default-src` directive (e.g., `'self'` or `'none'`)?
- Does it include the `frame-ancestors` directive to mitigate Clickjacking?
- Critically: Is `unsafe-inline` or `unsafe-eval` avoided in `script-src`? (Allowing these significantly weakens the protection).
## Remediation
CSP must be tailored to the specific application. There is no single "correct" policy.
**Step 1: The Baseline Policy (High Security)**
Start with a policy that denies everything by default and only allows resources from the same origin. It also prevents the site from being framed by anyone (Clickjacking protection).
```nginx
add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self';" always;
```
**Step 2: Adaptation (Example)**
If your application loads images from a CDN and needs to be embeddable by a specific partner site:
```nginx
add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; img-src 'self' https://cdn.example.com; frame-ancestors 'self' https://partner-site.com;" always;
```
**Note:** Use `Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only` during the testing phase to debug your policy without breaking the site.
## Default Value
By default, no Content Security Policy is sent. Browsers default to the standard Same-Origin Policy, which is much less restrictive.
## References
1. https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/HTTP_Headers_Cheat_Sheet.html
2. https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Clickjacking_Defense_Cheat_Sheet.html
3. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Headers/Content-Security-Policy
4. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Headers/Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only
5. https://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_headers_module.html#add_header
6. https://caniuse.com/?search=frame-ancestors
## Additional Information
OWASP HTTP Headers Cheat Sheet states:
Content Security Policy (CSP) `frame-ancestors` directive obsoletes `X-Frame-Options` for supporting browsers (source).
`X-Frame-Options` header is only useful when the HTTP response where it is included has something to interact with (e.g. links, buttons). If the HTTP response is a redirect or an API returning JSON data, `X-Frame-Options` does not provide any security.
Recommendation: Use Content Security Policy (CSP) frame-ancestors directive if possible.
Almost all modern browsers do support CSP. A comprehensive overview of compatible browsers can be found here: https://caniuse.com/?search=frame-ancestors
## CIS Controls
| Controls Version | Control | IG 1 | IG 2 | IG 3 |
| ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
| v8 | 2.7 Allowlist Authorized Scripts | N | N | Y |
| v7 | 2.9 Implement Application Whitelisting of Scripts | N | N | Y |
## MITRE ATT&CK Mappings
| Tactic | Technique |
| -------------- | --------------------------- |
| Initial Access | T1189 - Drive-by Compromise |
| Execution | T1059.007 - JavaScript |
## Profile
- Level 2 - WebserverTrust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
packages/app/public/apple-touch-icon-v3.png
packages/app/public/apple-touch-icon.png
packages/app/public/favicon-96x96-v3.png
packages/app/public/favicon-96x96.png
packages/app/public/favicon-v3.ico
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
eaf7d03223fcfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/cyberstrikeus__cis-nginx-v300-5-3-2.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-18 | eaf7d03223fc | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Cis Nginx V300 5 3 2 skill do?
Open-source AI-powered offensive security harness for automated penetration testing.
Is Cis Nginx V300 5 3 2 safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Cis Nginx V300 5 3 2 access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (eaf7d03223fc), read on 2026-10-18. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.
Add this badge to your README
Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/cyberstrikeus/cis-nginx-v300-5-3-2/)
Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.